The Men Whio Stare at Goats Argument Analysis

361 Words2 Pages
Trae Segers Brown- 4 English Language and Composition 12 April 2015 First Third of The Men Who Stare At Goats 1. I believe that the author’s main argument is that the government is does many things that we are not aware of. I feel this way because the whole novel is about the CIA, a secret government agency in the United States, and many ridiculous experiments they are trying. This argument is implicitly stated through the author’s humor. The author clearly makes fun of these secret agencies through his humor. This can be seen when he introduces the almost fictional novel by stating that “This is a true story” (1). By the time the reader reaches a few pages in, he/she can clearly see that this is most likely false and is simply criticizing the secret agencies in the US government. 2. I believe the author, Jon Ronson, uses humor most effectively. This can be seen when the author writes about the ridiculous secrets that the government has and other classified information. An example of this is when the author writes about secret test goats that only a few people know about. Ronson writes that “the existence of these hundred goats was known only to a select few Special Forces insiders” (7). The author’s portrayal of these secret agency officials both makes the reader laugh and also causes the reader to wonder about what much of this classified information is about. This type of humor is how the author portrays his argument throughout the novel. 3. I thought the author’s argument was very funny. It is a common thought the government does hide things from its citizens and it is interesting to think about what those things might be. I would have agreed with the author initially. Although the author’s examples I feel are a bit ridiculous, I do feel that the secret agencies of the government do hide a lot from us, a lot of things that we should know about. Overall,

More about The Men Whio Stare at Goats Argument Analysis

Open Document