“The Main Threat To The Stability Of The Weimar Re

1036 Words5 Pages
“The main threat to the stability of the Weimar Republic in the period of 1919-23 came from political violence of the extreme right” How far do you agree with this judgement? Although we can acknowledge the violence of the extreme right such as the Kapp-luttwitz putsch and Munich beer hall putsch were indeed real threats to the stability of the Weimar Republic they weren't the main threat. Ideally the treaty of versailles can be seen as more of a main threat due to the circumstances of which it was brought about and of course the consequences of the signing of the treaty. Political violence from the right may seem like the main threat as events such as the two putsch's and consul organisations carrying out assassinations of important left-wing political figures such as Mattihus Erzberger. When looking at what happened it can be assumed this did indeed threaten the stability of the Weimar Republic as it forced the government and Ebert (for the second time) to leave the capital, once again undermining Eberts status and to some emphasising his weak position within Germany. The government had to re-position in Dresden and the only thing Ebert could do was to call for a general strike to paralyse the movement of those who supported Kapp and Luttwitz. This shows the government as an institution had no real power to deal with threats such as these and was too reliant on other institutions such as the army (during the ruhr uprising) and the people striking (during the Kapp putsch). When considering the left as the main threat to Weimar stability it is perhaps thought it really was not. When looking at the KPD it only had around 10 percent support from the electorate and wasn't making any breakthroughs of becoming mainstream. This was mainly because Germans looked at Russia as evidence to be fearful of 'the reds' and as a result not support them. Although the Ruhr
Open Document