Socrates learned from Diotima that love is immortal. Hedwig has her own beliefs about love that are dependent from all different kinds of sources. However, that does not stop her from referencing, and quoting other beliefs about love throughout the movie. In Aristophanes speech he explains how human nature once was, as opposed to how it is now. In doing so, he is able to illustrate how “Love is the name of our pursuit of wholeness.” In the midst of his speech, Aristophanes recalls the story of how Zeus punished the past human race.
He first introduces it by taking us back into history. He talks about how in the earliest of times how none of the tribes would know each other but now, no one can get away from each other and we never really acknowledge each other either. He tries to find the right word for what today has become, he tries globalization and multiculturalism but neither of those work. “I have settled on “cosmopolitanism. Its meaning is equally disputed, and celebrations of the “cosmopolitan” can suggest an unpleasant posture of superiority toward the putative provincial” (68).
Reflecting on Euthyphro Juanita Young PHI 200 Mind and Machine Instructor Christine Nortz March 25, 2013 Reflecting on Euthyphro After reading Euthyphro by Plato, I was very intrigued as to how the initial idea of the story was so similar to that of situations still occurring in the world today. This story is based on situations that took place between two philosophers of the Greek and Roman times, Euthyphro and Socrates. Socrates seemed quite the skeptic in this story, constantly looking for answers to questions and actions of Euthyphro that he needed justification for. The reason Socrates wanted justified answers to his questions toward Euthyphro is what I’ll be discussing in this paper. I would also like to discuss the concept of how the topic of holiness emerged in the dialogue and why it plays a major role in the initial conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro.
Comparative and Contrast Essay Topic: “Compare/Contrast two historical figures – Plato and Aristotle.” Instructor: Ms. Dawn Stevens Words: 736 The philosophical evolution of ancient west world was influenced by two significant Greek philosophers, Plato and Aristotle. At their work we can find many common grounds at their opinions, which are explained by the fact that they are teacher and student, but also they have world-shaking differences. The main and most significant dissent of them was the perception about world. For Plato, which was idealist, all the truth is included at “World of Ideas”.
An essential distinction between the cultures of Athens and Jerusalem could be in how they attained knowledge. Human reason was the bases of Athenian culture and Faith was the essence of Jerusalem’s culture. (Entwistle, 2010, Chap. 1) Entwistle uses these two cultures to introduce the theme of his book and the bases of his integration argument, which is “All truths are God’s truths.” (Entwistle, 2010, p.13) The emphasis Entwistle poses is an emphasis on how we need to adapt our worldviews so that we can understand and possibly accept the truth held in both disciplines. (Entwistle, 2010, Chap.
(Source: williampax.com) According to Geoffrey Harpham, "Foucault sought not just to rehabilitate the chronically "incomplete project " of the Enlightenment as a subject of contemporary discussion but also to establish some positive relation of his own to that fissile and complex movement by reopening the question to which Kant had provided "an answer", almost two centuries ago." Thus, Foucault analysis Kant's take on Enlightenment as well as provided his own interpretation of the philosophy. However, due
Along with these two adjustments, I went through and fixed some grammatical errors and anything else that would keep you from understanding my viewpoints on the Tao-Te Ching. Hopefully this will clear up some of the nebulous phrasing and thoughts in my paper. Simplicity and Clarity: Rhetorical Analysis of “Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching” Lao-Tzu, known as the “Old Master”, so easily lives up to his name. Valued as a confidant for the Chou dynasty for his wisdom and insight, he worked with political figures for most of his career before withdrawing himself into a sort of self-inflicted exile. Before that time, he wrote a stream of ideas and thoughts of what makes a leader great using a visually appealing structure, almost poetic in form.
For sake of clarity I shall utilise the concepts of each in their respective sections. In the comparison and conclusion I shall continue this distinction and use the terminology of each. Hume: The Naturalistic Approach and the Problem of Induction Living and working in the years 1711-1776 David Hume was born into a climate of reason, the Age of the Enlightenment. As a man who has been called a genius by both his contemporaries and his after-comers, Hume excelled as a philosopher and as an agent of the ideals that ruled his time. Inspired by other such luminaries as Newton, Boyle, Locke and Hobbes, Hume sought to renew philosophy into a form more fitted to an age of reason and scientific enquiry.
The Dissolution of the Internet Bo Leonard Graham BYU–Idaho Abstract In the following analytical essay, Bo Graham argues, regarding Nicholas Carr’s, academic essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, that the use of effective patterns arguments such as particular personal experiences, doubt, specific factual cause/effect disputes, and historical vs. present day evidence, Carr is successful and arguing his claim. The author writes about the logic behind the strategies that Carr utilizes. In the author’s analysis, he refers to Carr’s personal experiences as well as experiences with Carr’s extended network and how it is portrayed in the argument. The author also discusses how the historical events brought up in Carr’s writing has a lasting effect on his audience. He concludes by supporting the success that Carr had in arguing his point.
Plato gave us a prelude to his argument for the immortality of the soul by introducing the relationship between pleasure and pain. In the dialogue Phaedo had “a strange feeling, an unaccustomed mixture of pleasure and pain” (59a). For Plato, this mixture of pleasure and pain could not exist without each other. He believed that you could not Robles 2 encounter both at the same time, but if one were experienced the other would inevitably follow. This relationship brought forth Plato’s first argument, which was the argument of opposites.