However, “reassured” may suggest a sense of caution and perceptiveness about Candy, and suggests that initially he did not trust George and Lenny. Coupled with this, Steinbeck describes Candy as speaking “more confidently” to George. This suggests that Candy is normally reserved and quiet. The judgemental society is to blame for the way that Candy is, trapped in a place where people are judged on appearance that feelings. Steinbeck wants us to feel sympathy for Candy because of the discriminatory situation in which he
Furthermore, it could also indicate Candy’s malefic side if at all he had one. Notice how he is scurrilously talking about Curley’s wife, with the clear intention of discrediting her, and getting George to talk to him. This displays him to be heedful and a social leper amongst the other itinerant workers: “Well, she got the eye”. In addition, another language device that Steinbeck uses in this passage to present Candy is adjectives. There are a variety of adjectives such as “Reassures” and “Safe” which incontrovertibly describe Candy’s thoughts and feelings.
The composer is communicating his belief that while human beings claim to be educated, just and accepting, we can sometimes be quite the opposite. The firm belief in what is considered to be socially acceptable has led to numerous misconceptions and stereotypes being created, simply to class someone with a label, rather than with a name or any other personifying feature. It is this human ability to judge that Van Allsburg is attempting to break down by showing through the use of metaphor, the corrupt foundations that are the basis for forming opinions. The Widow’s Broom is a book directed at children, but the messages it communicates, though indirectly, are incredibly powerful and very relevant to society. The responder views society from a number of different
Dubose and eventually win the reader over with their unseen goodness despite the heinous reputations they carry in society. This novel shows the reader that when a person or group of people judges someone else solely based on his/her unflattering attributes and actions, it is a very dubious approach and often misleading. Atticus illuminated one of the threads that binds the theme of the novel and society as a whole when he says to Scout, “You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view. . .
This shows disloyalty towards his people who are very loyal to him. Through these points, it is evident that Odysseus lacks the necessary traits of a true hero. Superficially, his victories and valor make him seem as though he is heroic. Yet, the underlying issue is that Odysseus tends to be selfish, disloyal and cowardly. By the end of his journey the many occurrences of his flaws outshine his perceived heroic qualities.
Sometimes in human society, good and evil will be passed along as incomplex, but Harper Lee displays her characters through the themes of good and bad. Atticus is a good man with a good head on his shoulders, but he does have his flaws. For example, “ he allows Aunt Alexandra to override his better judgement” (Jordison). Proving that he, Atticus, may be drawn away from the path of goodness. Atticus may be portrayed as good, but he has his doubtful moments.
While Falstaff’s ideals are pernicious, Henry’s condition is “to cold and temperate” and it is this very unsuitability to the throne that leads England to decay under his rule. He speaks contemptuously of “vulgar company,” “gibing boys” and “vile participation” in everyday life, illustrating his disdain for the common man. Simultaneously, he also idolizes Hotspur as “gallant,” “the theme of honours toungue,” and the “straightest plant…amongst a grove”. Yet in reality, Henry and Falstaff are both flawed role models, while Hotspur is also proven to be an inadequate leader. His ideas are deemed “dangerous,” “hare-brained,” and “uncertain” confirming that honour is not confined to valorous fighting.
Like Thoreau, Dr. King feels that there is an innate good in all people, and knows that the collective cannot idly sit by while their compatriots are done an injustice. At the exact same time, however, Dr. King is aware of the effects of psychological deindividuation found in group settings when he acknowledges that “groups tend to be more immoral than individuals” ( 12). This statement is more an attack on the white oppressors than anything else. Through deindividuation, Dr. King reduces his opponents to faceless masses incapable of thinking for themselves, but rather are subject to the mob mentality. Dr. King recognizes that this is a potential flaw in collective action, but the justice pursued by his movement prevents his collective from such ill effects.
Deception rules the land, self-deception included. Not knowing what you’re doing risks bad faith, and living exclusively in the present, and leaving sodden emotional disasters strewn behind.” Pg. 408. I like to think that deception could be used to show the power of the panopticon. Because your partner is the person you have power over and by using deception they can’t truly see what you are doing, so they go on not doing anything bad because they don’t know if they can see you but they might be watched.
Danforth is too radical for his own good and it ends up creating the nightmare known as the Salem Witch Trials. The fear his beliefs cause make him cowardly and weak minded. Proctor, on the other hand, knows his morals and standards, and lives an honest life. The farmer shows valor by standing up to Danforth, knowing that it would eventually result in his death if he went too far. Subsequently, he goes to the grave still holding onto his dignity and beliefs.