In this paper we will attempt to compare and contrast the differences and similarities of federal and state government as it pertains to their role in the implementation of criminal justice policy. We will try to address several aspects of policy for the development and implementation of those laws. The United States Constitution governs our nation. The Constitution provides the federal government the authority it needs to handle the nations international affairs as they deal with foreign policy, this enables the federal government to create and establish the national defense needs of the nation, and it also allows them the power to handle and deal with the issues which are currency related inside the nation. The federal government is superior to state government, and, because of this federal law will override state law.
Net neutrality refers to the ideal that ISPs and governments should treat all data equally. Information deserves a chance to spread; corporations and governments should not slow or halt this. Net neutrality suggests that ISPs and the government should not charge at different tiers for different types of information. Proponents of net neutrality argue that the large corporations seek to limit the speed of some information. By slowing some information transfer, while increasing the speed of other transfers, corporations and government may control what information spreads.
The plain meaning of this language might indicate a limited power to regulate commercial trade between persons in one state and persons outside of that state.“ (Thomas, 2014). The main reason for developing the effects on interstate commerce test was to conclude if it violates the dormant Commerce Clause: “(…) The United States Supreme Court has developed a series of test to determine whether a state regulation that affects interstate commerce violates the dormant Commerce Clause.” (Giachino, 2001). 3. Is most commerce considered “interstate commerce”? Why or why not?
Overtime the Constitution has been amended and thus the amendments have been established to further protect citizens from unlawful or repressive acts of government (Bill of Rights are included in the first ten amendments and were established in 1791). Inasmuch, the limited powers have been granted to the three branches of government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial) known as enumerated powers. Primary powers of government have been given to Congress; Congress has enumerated powers in 18 different clauses. The powers that generally impact business owners and managers include (1) the power to regulate commerce ( Commerce Clause ); (2) taxing the citizenry and commercial entities and spending government funds
In addition, the probabilities of driver texting on the cell phone and getting into accidents are only getting higher. Cell phone use while driving accounts for major cause of accidents and serious crashes. It does not matter how well one drives, if another driver is not being as careful, especially when using a phone, a split second one are put in danger by their own actions. However, the result of that leads to many deaths and produces numbers of hazards. The use of a cell phone while driving is very hazardous.
Ogden claimed that this was true only for goods, not navigation. Gibbons then sued Ogden for entry into the state and the case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. John Marshall ruled in favor of Gibbons, determining that it was within the federal government’s power to control navigation and that the regulation of “commerce” included laws of navigation. Conduction of interstate commerce was a power reserved to Congress, Marshall ruled. I believe that Marshall granted this case cert.
Thomas Gibbons however operated under a coasting license granted by the Federal Government. Ogden asked the New York Courts to issue an injunction forbidding Gibbons’ landing rights to the port of New York. The New York courts issued the injunction and Gibbons appealed to the U.S. courts, arguing that the federal coasting license superseded New York’s licensing requirements. This case questioned the meaning of Commerce Clause in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. It questioned the meaning of the word commerce in the Constitution; the trial would define whether commerce would be used broadly or narrowly.
Researchers at Texas A&M University’s Texas Transportation Institute studied the impact of texting in an actual driving environment. Drivers drove on a text course while sending and receiving text messages, while asked to stop when they saw a yellow flashing light. The results showed that the driver’s reaction time without texting was between one and two seconds, but texting increased it to three to four seconds (Study Finds Texting While Driving). In conclusion, texting while driving completely doubles a driver’s reaction time and puts other innocent drivers on the road in
Texting While Driving Many accidents are blamed on distracted driving and most of the distractions are caused by cell phone usage. However, some opponents feel that creating a law against cell phone use infringes their personal rights. Others think that banning someone from using their cell phone is equivalent to telling someone that they can’t adjust their radio or talk to someone else in their car. However, using a cell phone, whether talking or texting, while driving can be extremely dangerous; it should be made illegal because it is very hazardous to yourself and the people surrounding you. It can lead to the death of loved ones, and can be compared to the same level of danger as drunk driving.
Fatalities transpire every year because of carelessness while texting and driving. The topic of texting while driving has become extremely important within the years because of the number of deaths and car accidents that have occurred. The use of technology should be restricted while driving because of the distractions and the car accidents