Another reason why sociologists may not want to use questionnaires is their inflexibility. This meaning that once questionnaires have been sent out the researcher is stuck with the questions asked and cannot probe deeper or change the questions. This becomes a problem if during the research there becomes new areas of interest which now can no longer be explored. However it is argued that this can be partially combatted with the use of follow up questionnaires. Interpretivists sociologists also tend to not use questionnaires as they argue that they lack validity and do not give
I believe that if there is a God and He is great and loves us, then He would want us to think of others and volunteer and those type of things more than worshipping how amazing He is. That sounds very selfish to me. So this is why you should do what you think is right and not because someone tells you its right. Because if someone tells you something is right, they can still be wrong. No one can decide what is right or wrong except yourself.
First an inappropriate forecast was set regarding the project. It was not an appropriate amount of time for the scope of the project. The rest of the team was not confident in the project, nor were they enthusiastic. The time constraints added to this lack of project support. When beginning the project, an Implementation plan was not made, and followed through.
They all have different views of how they may affect society and other individuals around them but their end goal is the same. Source one and source three both believe men must take direct action In order to do so but source three believes that man often rushes into helping with the wrong solution, whilst source one believes the right answer just comes to mankind because of our original good nature and we do what we can to ease their suffering. Both of these sources are contradicted by source two. Even though the man in source two’s intention is to help out the world he is doing it an, an opposite way that source one and two would agree with. He decided that not taking any action is the best action.
With god/s grounding the moral the foundation of the moral becomes arbitrary because it would only be good because god says its so. Also calling god good would not make any sense since he decided what good is or isn't, so how could he be good unless the moral was grounding him? If piety was a certain care of the god’s we could look to do always what is Pious and in return we would be worshiping/caring for the god/s if they exists. If the God’s are looking to something the “moral,piety” then if you act pious in your actions through life you will be in a way worshiping the god’s, because you are honoring what they already honer. The problem with this idea is when people think god grounds the moral
Happiness Follows from Virtue Epictetus asserted that while there is no inherent problem in seeking material comfort, the only true good thing is virtue because only virtue can be beneficial in all situations; thus virtue would not ever fail to bring happiness. This conclusion follows from the reasoning of the Stoic philosophical tradition, which states that a virtuous and reasoning person would live "according to nature" and seek true happiness from within. Epictetus said that with virtue, people would be able to efficiently live a good life; the only value in material things, such as money, is that the virtuous could use them to further
The importance of honest, morally satisfying, work and respecting the property that is the result of that work is fulfilling. And, he speaks that culture is corrupted by people that allow governments to protect property rather than people. The closing statement of“Nothing can bring you peace but yourself. Nothing can bring you peace but the triumph of principles. (Emerson p. 374)”, is Emerson’s way of explaining the importance of self worth.
SEC failed at this due to the fact that their product will not operate above 130 degrees F, and that the requirements would not be able to be met without different materials (The Orion Shield Project, 2003). Due to this issue alone, it caused problems with the project, delaying the timeline for completion, increased the amount of resources used and not committing to the stakeholders. Not only did they fail to meet the temperature standard, they also failed to meet the life span expectation. Mr. Allison is responsible for overcoming these technical objectives as project manager of The Orion Shield Project. Ethical Issue: Before even beginning the project, Mr. Allison couldn’t keep his commitment in regards to meeting the temperature requirement.
The organizational problem with periodization is that because there are so many things happening at one time, a historian is not able to focus on them all. The ethical issue with periodization is that is easily implies value judgments the technical problem of periodization is that it no system of periodization can solve all cultural issues or satisfy all demands. 3. These labels are problematic because they may not be specific enough. Big Thought Activity Prequel 1.
He means that if the venture needs you to be anyone else but yourself, it will lead to no good. This reveals to me that Thoreau believes strongly in the individual, being yourself, and seeking your own path. This quote is also applicable to modern life because many ventures nowadays require you to conform for some purpose. The second aphorism I remembered is “Our life is frittered away by detail...Simplicity, simplicity.” Thoreau means that our focus and attention to detail now in society and culture do nothing but to waste our lives away needlessly. He believes simplicity is the better choice.