All humans, even those in the embryonic stage, are created by God and deserve our protection and respect. Also, it is not even verified that these cells can live up to the expectations of scientists, and in addition to committing murder for what is based on pure speculation, there are health risks involved in transplanting stem cells, since the cells have the possibility of passing viruses and even turning cancerous. Furthermore, scientists are cloning embryos in order to overcome tissue rejection during cell transplants and this will inevitably lead to human cloning (Stem Cells). Therefore, embryonic stem cell research should not be legalized and continued since it is morally wrong, dangerous, and may even lead to
Research cloning would be used mainly to reproduce embryos for their stem cells. B. Reproductive cloning would be used to create humans for infertile or homosexual couples. This is considered immoral even by pro-cloning advocates C. Both Research cloning is used primarily to harvest embryonic stem cells. A.
Studies believe that sex refers to the genitals, musculature, body shapes and hormones. Furthermore, we could also imply that sex is culturally constructed; essentially any form of phenomenon constructed can vary from culture to culture. Sex is believed to be the natural bodies, which can be divided into sexes without culture. Therefore, sex doesn’t genuinely dictate gender, but gender itself is the main cause why it is possible for biologist/scientist to identify a person’s sex. Gender is socially constructed, which doesn’t necessarily signify that females and males are the same nor does their culture makes them different.
If the teleological argument is correct in saying that God created humans like a machine, then you would expect humans to be perfect creations, but we are not. Humans are flawed in many ways including the fact that we have extra organs, and that our skeletons are not created properly for the way we walk. Humans are not machines in any way, and the fact that we are not perfect machines is explained by the theory of evolution. Therefore the theory of evolution is proof against the teleological argument and that God is the creator of the human race and the earth. I feel that this argument fails to prove the existence of God.
Many alternatives are accessible to use. Using other options instead of animals for research come with infinite benefits including less expensive procedures, more animals in their natural habitats, and unharmed organisms. It eliminates the factor of harming animals in order to proceed with scientific discoveries. Sullivan (2012) finds it “less spendy” and faster to use artificial skin and human eye models in addition to the fact they are more accurate methods. These non-animal methods replace those archaic animal tests, and take less time to complete.
There are many who view embryonic stem cell research as a procedure with many benefits. There are also many who view it as a procedure that is ethically wrong. Despite the promises cloning can provide, opponents view the procedure as morally wrong on ideological grounds while supporters hope that embryonic stem cell research can provide cures for numerous diseases and afflictions. To understand more of the controversy that surrounds embryonic stem cell research, readers must understand the differences and similarities of the two different type of cloning: therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning. “Therapeutic cloning creates human embryos through cloning in order to harvest their stem cells for medical research; reproductive cloning creates the embryos for human reproduction”.
Cloning seems like such an amazing thing to discover; the power over DNA manipulation might have baffled us and gotten us excited, but it is not something that is ethical. If the ability to modify the DNA of human beings is allowed to be practiced, there will be no end to what unnatural thing we will do. The technological advances that have been made in health have benefited us immensely but neither therapeutic nor reproductive cloning are wise uses of our new found knowledge. There is no doubt that with this technology, we will soon want to design our unborn children. When this becomes possible, it will not only change the process of child conception into a manufacturing process but also segregate the designer children and the naturally conceived children into two separate social classes that will eventually segregate the
So with that, they think the embryo is already a human being. The other side, which I’m pro for, is saying that the egg may be potential for human life when fertilized, but if it doesn’t attach itself to the uterus than it isn’t considered one (Advance Science Serving Society). As a whole most people are against it, because they’re scared of what we could do and see how far we can go with the technology we have. I understand the reason for most of those people’s worries. I was scared with what we could do myself, but I have a way we could make people not as scared.
So sometime in the future parents will be provided the genetic technology Gattaca had. As this new way of birth comes around there should be some restrictions. Certain characteristics of the child’s DNA should be off limits. Any kid would be grateful for more intelligence, and gladly welcome a healthy life rid from all diseases. The traits such as athleticism, musical talent, writing, any other art or specific work shouldn’t be tampered with.
It is always easier and less awkward to talk with people that you already know, as in a friendship. Advantages of Using This Method – There are advantages to this method as well. Generally speaking, your friends probably trust you more than they would trust a Bible-thumping stranger. This makes them comfortable enough around you that a conversation starter is not necessary and the topic can be freely open between you. Finally, this friend is going to have confidence that they already have a friend with like beliefs and, therefore, a good support system.