The Great Gatsby Sentimental Fraud

743 Words3 Pages
‘Nick Carraway was taken in; Gatsby was a vulgar, sentimental fraud’ Overall this statement is accurate however it’s possible to argue against it. This essay will argue that the statement is only partially true because of these key points: firstly to regards of the statement “nick Carraway was taken in’ by the fame and extravagance, of Gatsby, it can be argued he only admires he never becomes like Gatsby; secondly with regards to the statement, “ Gatsby was a vulgar sentimental fraud”, on the one hand he was a fraud as he changed his whole identity yet sentimental as he kept a part of his past and wont let go, and vulgar because he left his family to become rich. On the other hand, even though Gatsby was all these things he had good intentions and he does these things to become a better person and not for the wrong motives. The third way in which the statement can be seen as…show more content…
Gatsby is a very sentimental man; it’s shown though his name. If Gatsby didn’t want to keep a part of his old identity he would of completely invented a new identity, but instead Gatsby just changes his name from James Gatz to jay Gatsby the names are roughly the same. However the main part of how Gatsby is sentimental is how he wont let go of his past with daisy. Gatsby is determined to rekindle his love with daisy just how it was before “‘cant repeat the past? He cried incredulously. ‘Why of course you can!’” Gatsby is determined to recapture the idyllic past he had with daisy but his expectations are too high of what he wants from daisy. Gatsby’s sentimentality links into the contextual importance of ‘the great Gatsby’ because it shows how people who came east back in those days wanted to keep parts of their original background with them so created places like little Italy if they were Italian. This relates back to Gatsby’s name and how he doesn’t fully invent a new name just adapts the old one to sound more

More about The Great Gatsby Sentimental Fraud

Open Document