‘the Falsification Principle Offers No Real Challenge to Religious Beliefs’ Discuss

1265 Words6 Pages
The falsification principle is a method of working out whether language is meaningful by looking at scientific methods of proving the statement wrong, if you can think of a way in which the statement could be proved wrong then the statement has meaning. It is a theory closely associated with Karl Popper (1902-1994) and Antony Flew (1923-present). Karl popper was born in Vienna and was agnostic, even though he was raised by a Christian family. He started to question logical positivism and the verification principle when writing a book and founded the idea of falsification through his discussion of scientific method. Popper stated that in order for a statement to be scientifically true you had to be able to think of a way to disprove it. For example, to prove water boils at 100 degrees you would have to design an experiment that would disprove it if it was wrong such as taking the temperature of the water as it boils. If the statement could be proved false then it is meaningful but if you could not prove a statement to be false then it is not meaningful. He said that statements of personal taste were not scientific. Although Popper never applied the falsification principle directly to religious language, it is clear that this could pose challenges to religious beliefs as you cannot falsify a religious statement. However, you could say it doesn’t pose a challenge to religious beliefs as Popper never applied the falsification principle to religious beliefs and could have had a different view towards religious statements. However, John Hick (1922-present) argued from the side of religion saying that the falsification principle doesn’t offer any real challenges to religious beliefs. This is because Hick believed in eschatological verification, this is that a statement can be verifiable if true but not falsifiable if false. This means that if religious statements are

More about ‘the Falsification Principle Offers No Real Challenge to Religious Beliefs’ Discuss

Open Document