As you can see, the system needs to change because its not helping some women at all, its hurting them. Furthermore, I believe that some children are better off with there fathers. When non-custodial fathers are highly involved with their children’s learning, the children are more likely to get A's at all grade levels (2007 National Center for Education Statistics). Some mothers are to busy doing meaningless things, and are not worried about the well being of there children. Highly involved fathers also contribute to increased mental dexterity in children, increased empathy, less stereotyped sex role beliefs and greater self- control (Abramovitch, H. 1997.
Deadbeat Dad's (The Glass Menagerie) In General, more children can benefit from the special relationship of two parents who care for them and are actively involved in their lives.As we get into this paper I will be futherly explaining Deadbeat dads who refuse to take care of their children force families into a life of struggle, and how Mr. Wingfield from "The Glass Menagerie" , a play,by Tennesse Williams is a major example for this fact. According to the Universsity of Maryland Medical Center, "Children who have fathers in their lives learn better, have higher self-esteem and show fewer signs of depression than children without fathers".Deadbeat dads is basically a term referring to obligor fathers that have freely chosen not to be a financially supportive parent in their children's lives. The term"Deadbeat Dads" was used by the child support agency to refer to men who have fathered a child and willingly fail to pay child support ordered by a family law court or statutory agency such as the Child Support Agency. Delinquent child support is actually one of the most leading causes of poverty and financial problems in the United States and it's definite'y also a criminal offense under Federal Law.Time in prison is just one of many possible consequences of failing to support your child. I dont think that this is worth it.
For example, kids that have lots of high conflict in their family are happier after the divorce occurs. They are happy as adults and are the same as kids from intact families. Children that take it the hardest are the ones from low conflict families. It undermines their sense of trust, they have great psychological distress as they grow older, and research shows they have trouble forming their own relationships and are particularly unhappy as adults. Overall, being taken out of a stressful household is an easier transition that being a yanked out of a peaceful one.
It’s beneficial as there are male and female role models available for the children, and it gives the parents more control of how their children are brought up. Another strength is that there’s less interference from wider family members however this can also be seen as a negative aspect, as other people are unaware of what’s happening and if there was any problems within the family and therefore it’s difficult to identify neglect. This also makes it difficult to seek professional help outside of the family. Another disadvantage of this privatised nuclear family is that children are only exposed to one set of values and so are influenced to become like their parents in the future as they have no exposure to other behaviours of different families. A criticism of this
So there is less women committing crimes than men showing a gender difference in crime. Also there is the sex-role theory which has multiple parts to it. One part is socialisation which talks about how girls are socialized differently to boys at young ages. Parsons talked about how girls have clear role models in their mothers, compared to boys. A longitudinal study by Farrington and Painter into female offenders showed that they have poor or erratic parenting which meant that they did not get the right socialisation from their mothers which could have led to this crime being committed, showing a gender difference in crime.
Absent fathers can be the biggest social problem in the world. Raising children without a father can damage a child's perspective, making it difficult to adopt a masculine world. Fathers are the primary source who showed tough love,discipline, and encouraging success for their child.Due to the Absentee of father's guidance the development of a child is effected emotional, educational, and opportunity wise. I wonder if this pattern from men will ever change? In now days education is a big deal, and absent of fathers interaction effect female interest in academic advancement.
Discriminating to enthusiastic needs of youngsters is the way of family structure. Losing one individual in a gathering of two crushes the relationship. Structure, accordingly, makes a more noteworthy requirement for upkeep of the relationship through the representation of friendship. The dissent of negative emotions may limit critical thinking exertions (Phelan, 1979) . As indicated by The Family Pediatrics Report (2003), the dangers for enthusiastic, behavioral, and instructive issues are lower among youngsters in 2-guardian families as a rule.
They have more wisdom and life experiences to share with their children. On the opposite side, younger mothers are inclined to demonstrate undeveloped emotional stability, seem to lack necessary control and can be more immature. Society holds mixed reviews on whether it is fair and reasonable for a more mature woman to conceive and bare children. Some view the decision as selfish. Once the parent begins to age, the children are left with the responsibility of caring for his or her elderly parent.
A child who has men or women constantly walking in and out of their life may get the impression that the opposite sex is more a toy than a person to love and trust. Also, there is evidence that children tend to enjoy better life outcomes when the same two parents give them support and protection. Furthermore, research shows that “children who have experienced the breakdown of their parents’ relationship are more likely to have poor cognitive development and education and employment outcomes than those who have lived with both birth parents”. Therefore, they believe that all Christians should get married because it’s the best atmosphere to bring up children. On the other hand, others argue that marriage isn’t important, as long as you promise to love and cherish each other forever.
These flawed parenting skills become inconsistent and the parents tend to be non-supportive of their children. When parents are working in the household, children are influenced. Parents with adequate amounts of money are more likely to show more affection and warmth when raising