But the empire were very inconsiderate and silly as people were paying the taxes by growing and harvesting crops which they would sell to the markets in order to pay for the taxes. The markets then started to bring in less money as there were fewer products being sold to the markets. They then had to raise the taxes leaving more people in poverty, which also caused many deaths. This is just one reason for the collapse for the Empire. The second reason for the collapse of the army was Religion, Christianity that had a massive influence on a lot of the population of
All of these technological advances were made with the intention of helping farmers and improving their working conditions, but instead, they backfired and made things even worse than before. Government policies also had a negative impact on agriculture. The politics of this period were dominated by the “political party deadlock” between the Democrats and the Republicans. The two parties were evenly matched for many years, but the Republican Party soon won the presidency and both houses of Congress, eventually rising to the top in the 1890s and breaking the
Bad working conditions in the country sparked numerous strikes and riots, and the sheer lack of exports meant there was an increase of imports, and therefore costs continued to rise. Mussolini saw that the economy was in dire need of vast improvement, and along with it the standard of living was nearly in a state of disrepair. Throughout the years 1922-1943 Mussolini formulated 4 key Battles to aid and expand his economy; Battle of the Grain (1925), Battle of the Lira (1926), Battle of the Births (1927), and the Battle of the Marshes (1928). From 1922 to 1925, Mussolini's regime pursued a laissez-faire economic policy under the liberal finance minister Alberto De Stefani. De Stefani reduced taxes, regulations, and trade restrictions and allowed businesses to compete with one another.
This was completely unnecessary and ineffective as we know that many of the VC were in fact the peasants themselves. This was not only useless but increased the unpopularity of the regime and increased the number of VC due to more people being upset by their removal from their land. Strict censorship and the overall dictorial nature of the Regime led to the US providing economic support to prop-up the failing regime, although what they were unaware of is the longer the regime lasted the more escalated the situation became and therefore increasing US involvement further. The US involvement in rigging the 1955 elections was a metaphorical shot in the foot for the US as the Regime used nepotism to promote family into positions of power. This clearly angered the South Vietnamese people however the US increased involvement further by providing political backing to Diem- Eisenhower gave public support to the regime.
Additionally, suspicions had risen of radical parliamentarians and the people were reliant on Charles’ return to stop this. These reasons are the main factors for Charles’ support in 1646. Charles’ return to the throne would have meant an end to Parliament’s County Committees, which many felt were worse than living under Charles’ rule. A large portion of the population had suffered the brutal dominion of the County Committees, which only worsened as the war progressed and Parliament became more desperate to finance the war. Primarily made up of fiercely loyal Puritans, the County Committees were efficient in reaching the monthly quotas set by Parliament.
Short term causes included the embarrassing defeated faced by Russia in the Russo-Japanese war. This loss to a ‘second rate power’ not only undermined the Tsars power, but also resulted in already poor conditions in towns deteriorating further. The high taxes that were introduced at one of the many times of great famine angered many peasants already struggling to survive. Finally the economic slump further raised unemployment in the working classes. Although at first glance the revolution may appear to have been a failure, there were many successes that came as a result.
Also, many experts say that it fell because of the lack of heart the people had to the Empire, the rise of Christianity, it was too immense to govern and protect, the decline of the economy and jobs, the army being made up of mostly foreigners, and outside invaders. Thus, one can say that the Empire collapsed more internally than externally. The first reason why the Western Roman Empire fell was because the people that lived in it had a lack of heart in the Empire. People didn’t believe the Empire was worth saving anymore. As Strayer, Gatzke, and Harbison state in their textbook The Course of Civilization states “The basic trouble was that very few inhabitants of the empire believed that the old civilization was worth saving… the overwhelming majority of the population had been systematically excluded from political responsibilities.
In turn this would destroy Britain commercially and their industrial economy allowing Napoleon to take over Britain however did not work and left Napoleon worse off then he was before. His next mistake was the Peninsular war and as a result weakened his empire even more by the Spanish guerrillas, Germans, and Italians turning against him. Lastly his third mistake lost him most of his soldiers and the tactic used to defeat him was the scorched-earth policy, by the Russians. These mistakes greatly weakened Napoleons Empire. The empire was then declared war on by Britain, Russia, Prussia, Sweden, and Austria.
Therefore it is safe to say that Nicholas ll had greater number of failures than successes during his reign. Firstly, let us analyze the successes of Tsar Nichols ll. The Tsar’s reforms themselves cannot be directly attributed to him, for they were mostly introduced by his two most competent ministers: Sergei Witte, Minister of Finance from 1892-1903 and Peter Stolypin, Chief Minister from 1907-1914. Sergei Witte was well aware of the miserable conditions that existed in Russia. There was agricultural inefficiency and backwardness, industrial out was one of the lowest among European nations and poor transportation and communication caused delays that hurt the economy.
As seen in “The Farmers’ Grievances”, a skillful farmer, compared to his physicist or tailor counterparts would never terminate his financial troubles; and in contrast to other professions, advancements and pioneering in the farming field only dug the financial pit deeper (Document A). Many of the financial troubles faced by farmers portrayed them to be not the indispensible feeding hand of America, but perhaps just the opposite, as stated by Mary E. Lease: “The great common people of this country are slaves, and monopoly is the master. The West and South are bound and prostrate before the manufacturing East.” (Document C) Lease provides a vital historical aspect of farming, comparing farmers to “common people”, rather than the agricultural giants that they are today. It thus becomes apparent why a worker putting so much effort into his business but getting so little out would wish to revolt. Railroad companies that charged four times as much as on the East gave farmers incentive to band together in order to combat outrages rates politically (Document D).