They put this man to death without evidence to support that he committed this crime. Also the death penalty cost lots of money, people are sometimes falsely accused, and biblical reasons don’t support this. No one should be sentenced to death because of a mistake they made in their life. A person can just be in jail for the rest of their life instead of the government paying for someone to be put to death. It is twice as much money to have the death penalty than to have someone in jail.
Colorado is one of the only states in the Union that does not support Jessica’s Law, or the safety of children. The fact that these Liberal states won’t take a law like this seriously just shows the way our country is heading. It is clear that frivolous issues such as the legalization of marijuana are far more important to Colorado than the safety of children or else they would pass Jessica’s law and stop making excuses about their laws being tough enough. Colorado is now a place where sex offenders and perverts flock, over 10,000 of them in that state alone; and sadly, the number keeps growing (Gidenko). Again this number could be even higher, but due to the fact their law does NOT require them to register, how do law abiding citizens of that great state know?
Does the Federal Government have too much Power? From the time of the Articles of Confederation to the beginning of the Constitution, power tensions between the federal government and the state governments have always been an issue. This ongoing struggle between governments has left a hole in our nation’s upbringing. Questions have arisen as to whom should be allowed to enforce what laws, due to the fine line separating federal and state. Hundreds of political figures have attempted to create a rule to serve as a guideline for the division of power; however nothing has seemed to work.
“Can you name one law that would keep guns out of the hands of criminals” (Webster)? Assault Weapons Ban: “Handguns are used in about 90% of all firearm murders” (Webster). No legitimate study in the U.S. has ever shown that gun control has any positive impact on crime. People want to believe gun control will reduce crime, but the truth is that gun control will never work. History has shown that gun control will never work.
The reason is the perceived view that it is the lack of gun control that has resulted in the number of firearms-related deaths in the country. In fact, this is one of the most stated, but wrong, arguments for gun control. The fact of the matter is that if gun control is put into place there are more chances that law-abiding citizens will be victims. Gun control laws to a large extent can have no effect on criminals, as there will always be a thriving black market for trade of guns and firearms. (Nair,
Since the capital punishment is still carry on, many opponents and defenders of the death penalty appeal to the sanctity of life. However, the death penalty is not justified. This is because death penalty is not an effective crime deterrent, executed innocent people and it needs a higher cost to carry on. First of all, some opponents argue that death penalty can help deter crime and protect public. For instance, the criminal will think twice before killing for fear of receive the strongest punishment.
However it would have had a tremendous and awful impact on the United States society as it did represent the war as evil and criminal. The US Army always denied that the bombs they let off never hit civilian casualties; they stated that there was not many of them. The journalist's reports broadened, which was still furthering the credibility gap'. This is the state or condition of being dissimilar or unlike between the American military and government and what the American people had confidence in. The broader the gap is, not as much the people will believe.
About two years ago Illinois abolished the death penalty. The death penalty is an inhumane way to get rid of people that have committed serious crimes but that doesn’t mean that they have the right to do that. Some people say that the death penalty is much cheaper than keeping criminals in prison. Does this leave u perplexed? Well it shouldn’t because it costs a lot of money to create those lethal injections and electric chairs and other tools used to give the death penalty.
There are several issues that the system faces and must address. Two of these issues are disparity throughout the system as well as discrimination. Discrimination is an issue that is well known to many people whether they have personally experienced the criminal justice system or not. Disparity is an issue that is not as well known amongst the public, mostly because many people have a hard time distinguishing the difference between discrimination and disparity. Discrimination Discrimination in the criminal justice system has been debated for many years and, to this day, remains unresolved.
Over time the death penalty could cost well over one million dollars more than life-in-prison cases. For one person to be put to death it would take at least up to $500,00 for one inmate. This is absolutely absurd amount to end another person’s life when they could spend their entire life in jail with the guilt. (“What Costs More the Death Penalty or Life in Prison?” Home - NBC Right Now/KNDO/KNDU Tri-Cities, Yakima, WA, NBC, 21 Sept. 2011, www.nbcrightnow.com/story/15519792/what-costs-more-the-death-penalty-or-life-in-prison.) This money could be invested into each and every school nationwide.