Summary of “California’s Solar Energy Battle” In the article “California’s Solar Energy Battle” by Lowell Parker, the author points out that the solar power is in competition with fossil fuel utility companies. Many people in the U.S. are living in financial turmoil. People are finding various ways to save money, and they are advocated to use renewable energy, particularly solar energy. Thereby fossil fuel utilities began to unnecessarily worry that they are making less and less profits. This circumstance led to a battle between utilities and the solar incentive plan in California.
BFC 32703 SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT 1 GREEN BUILDING: CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE California Academy of Science Introduction California Academy of Science which declared in2008 to be certified LEED Platinum. This is the greenest museum in the world and thus the highest possible rating from the US Green Building Council. California Academy of Science comprises of a roof top vegetation of living plants that cover 2.5 acres of landmass, 60,000 photo voltanic cells, indoor rainforest with living animal and plants, NASA sponsored planetarium and living aquarium, all of which contribute to its eco credentials. The building was designed by the architectural group Renzo Piano Workshop in Genoa, Italy. Concept
And research that would address the issue of the best way to safely store waste from nuclear power plants. Those aren't the types of quick-fix ideas that can help candidates win elections. * Politics Today: Memphis Commercial Appeal, May 19, 2008 Might Support I. Carbon Capture and Solar Power In 2012, Alexander supported an EPA regulation called Utility MACT which would require hundreds of coal plants to add costly new emissions controls or risk shut down. In 2011, The EPA required TVA to purchase an estimated $3 to $5 billion on new and upgraded state-of-the-art pollution controls.
The usage of burning oil and coal can be costly. Most of these facts are hidden from us but it is true. Not only does it cost money to burn the oil and coal but the construction of these power plants, workers, materials, money for labor workers and the transportation of the substance. Sulfur dioxide is not environmental friendly and is probably one of the worst substances for our earth. It can cost billions of dollars to run a plant like this were recycling saves us tons of money on our renewable resources and has very little cost of reconstructing a product.
Fracking is bad for the environment. People still need natural gas or oil to live their life. It will take time to get all of the bugs worked out of fracking. Fracking companies are using the new technology to insure the protection of the environment. Fracking is a cheaper way of obtaining gas.
Wind turbines are clean, effective and nonpolluting; however, one cannot predict the speed or direction exactly. The heavier populated areas require more energy. Not enough wind and the turbine will not turn. Wind turbines are noisy, threatens wild life, and is an eye sore along with costly for the initial funding. Solar energy is a non-pollutant, cost effective, maintenance free, life span of up to 40 years; however the upfront cost is enormous, and not everyone can afford the cost to put the stylish panels on their roof tops.
What message is he peddling that few seemingly want to hear? It’s twofold: No. 1, solar and wind power cannot meet the world’s voracious demand for energy, especially given the projected needs of emerging economies like India and China, and No. 2, nuclear power is our best hope to get off of fossil fuels, which are primarily responsible for the heat-trapping gases cooking the planet. Many in the environmental community say that renewable energy is a viable solution to the climate problem.
Individually these elements would not be as effective because a state could earn high test scores because of unequal spending per student, and vice versa. This is where the argument is the strongest, but there are, however, weaker parts of the argument. For example, the arguer does not touch on issues which also have implications on why the schools are preforming the way they are. In the paper he states as part of his argument, “think tanks rate sates on things like class size and teacher pay among other things.” He does not, however, touch on these differences which might be the reason why Utah is doing seemingly better than Florida. There are no statistics provided in the argument comparing class size, teacher pay, or socioeconomic conditions which may leave a reader wondering if other factors are to blame for Florida’s poor performance.
The supply of solar energy demeans the supply of fossil fuels when compared. The unlimited supply does not pose the same destructive effects to the environment and health. Solar energy, according to Klare (2010) “is clean, green, safe and smart” (p. 12). Solar energy provides efficiencies because it does not need the current volume of resources needed today to generate power. The predominant draw back to relying on solar power it that it will take a dedicated plan over 40 years to complete.
Many fossil fuel industries tend to lie about clean renewable energy; the main lie is usually how it’s to expensive to use green energy and it’s much cheaper to stick to fossil fuels. Much of the public sticks to this lie for the sole reason that they only know how to use fossil fuel and nothing