Table of Contents Introduction Page 2 Background Page 3 Time line of incidents and decisions made during the Notting Hill Riots Page 9 Discussion into the decision-making process used by the Incident Commander Page 15 Conclusion Page 24 Introduction. The aim of this paper will be to demonstrate and showcase my improved understanding of emergency decision making. I will achieve this by conducting a case study and discussing the reading ‘Police Commander – The Notting Hill Riot”, written by Tony Moore of the Disaster Management Centre, Cranfield University in 2002. I will include a detailed timeline of events that occurred during the Notting Hill riots on the 20 April 1982, with particular focus on the progressive decision points of the incident. Each of these decision points will be charted in the timeline and relevant pieces of information that influenced the decision will be included for analysis.
01.01 Assignment Historians apply geographic skills in order to learn about the past and solve historical problems. Complete the two parts of the following written assignment to show your understanding of these skills. Directions: You will need to go to the 1.01 Geography Assignment page in your course and use the interactive to complete this assignment. Please note that this assignment has two parts to it. Be sure that you complete each part thoroughly.
Abstract In this paper I will perform an evaluation of Martha Rogers’s theory of the Science of Unitary Human Beings using Chinn & Kramer (2004) model for evaluating a theory. The evaluation will reflect description of the theory as well as critical reflection of the theory that Chinn & Kramer (2004) has utilized in developing the criteria for evaluating theories. Theory Critique Chinn and Kramer (as citied by Meleis, 2012) developed a model that has given a reviewer a set of questions to help in the evaluation of theories and the knowledge that it incorporates. The questions lead the reviewer through the description and critical reflection of the theory. In the following paragraphs I will address each question purposed as it relates to Martha Rogers’s theory of the Science of Unitary Human Beings.
It should be read in conjunction with the examiners’ report for 6BI06 – June 2010. The comments here apply to both the externally examined and internally assessed options. This document contains additional comments on each criterion followed by extracts of candidates’ work with examiner’s assessments. General Points This unit seeks to test skills which have been acquired throughout the A‐level course. It is expected that these skills will be developed through use of the core practicals and are closely linked to the requirements of ‘How Science Works’ criteria.
In what ways does ‘Pathways Theory’ inform your understanding of how young people become involved in, and desist from, offending behaviour? Where possible make reference to your own practice. In this assignment I aim to discuss my understanding of ‘Pathways Theory’, its validity and furthermore the way in which it informs practice in predicting recidivism. Elder et al 2001 (cited in France and Homel, p.298) refers to ‘Pathways Theory’ as theoretical and empirical work in the field of life course studies and the developmental sciences, including developmental psychology, life span sociology and psychology, life history research and studies of the life cycle. I aim to highlight how ‘Pathways Theory’ influences the Youth Justice System coupled with the Scaled approach furthermore my knowledge and understanding of offending behaviour as a Youth Offending Officer within my practice, that of my team.
HSI-154 HOMELAND WMD/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DOT ERG EXERCISE EMMANUEL BONSO ABBAN NAME: ___________________________ Activity: Download: DOT Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG) http://phmsa.dot.gov/staticfiles/PHMSA/Downloa dableFiles/Files/erg2008_eng.pdf Objective: Demonstrate the use of the DOT ERG. Given an ID number, material name or container type find the ERG guide number for that material. Given a scenario for a hazmat incident use the ERG to find recommendations for response actions. Rationale Instructions: This activity will allow class participants to practice using the DOT ERG. Look up the information requested in the DOT ERG.
A guide for critique of research articles Following is the list of criteria to evaluate (critique) a research article. Please note that you should first summarize the paper and then evaluate different parts of it. Most of the evaluation section should be devoted to evaluation of internal validity of the conclusions. Please add at the end a section entitled ''changes in the design/procedures if I want to replicate this study." Attach a copy of the original article to your paper.
Utilising the APS framework in formulating ideas and legal parameters. Ensuring that all parties involved had definition and clarity regarding their roles. In addition, careful monitoring and managing the schedule and providing feedback through survey evaluation to determine the success/failure of project. Word Count 2, 199 References Lampeter University Of Wales Lampeter ‘Certificate in Intergenerational Practice’ Voluntary Sector Studies 2007 Delroy Fletcher, January 2004 ‘Reducing Re-offending the Enterprise Option’Study Commissioned by the Small business Service, Centre for Regional Economic and Social Economics www.bis.gov.uk/files/file38350.pdf 1.1,-1.4,2.1 -2.6. Beth Johnson Foundation (2000) Approved Provider Standard for Organisations Providing Intergenerational Projects or Programmes.
| Process and Outcome Evaluations | | | | | | | Within this paper, I will be going over the characteristics of what process evaluation and outcome evaluations are and I will also be giving two examples of each evaluation. | Process and Outcome Evaluations I will be starting this paper off by describing what a Process Evaluation and how it works. A Process Evaluation is used to document as well as monitor the planning and execution of those plans, as well as the interrelationship of the components of the proposed project and the collection of data from the project. The three main objectives are A) program interventions, B) Program planning and development and C) database management system. Program intervention
Explain the purpose of agreeing objectives and deadlines when researching information. If possible, refer to specific examples from research tasks you have worked on to support your answer. 2. Identify the different ways of researching, organising and reporting information. 3a) For your own organisation (or one you know well), describe the procedures that need to be followed when archiving, retrieving and deleting information.