Often this issue is framed as rehabilitation vs punishment, as if it's an all or nothing choice between the two options. In reality most people would agree that some kind of balance between the two is favourable. Yet all too often rehabilitation seems to be a mere footnote and punishment is seen as the priority. I will be arguing that this emphasis should be inverted, and that when dealing with convicted criminals rehabilitation should be society's main aim with punishment given less priority. I will attempt to prove that the benefit of merely punishing criminals is minimal and that a justice system that prioritises rehabilitation would have far more overall benefit to society as a whole.
First I am going to talk about the supporters. They believe that all youth should be responsible for their actions. Their key arguments are: Stiffer charges will make the youths think twice before they do the crimes; this will lead to lower crime rates in future. Youths who commit crimes are sent to rehabilitation, while sometimes their victims are left to suffer forever. The youth’s age shouldn’t be a bias factor for receiving punishments.
There were several reasons behind this. One reason was to divert ones who would normally have no issue in committing a crime and for ones who have already committed crimes after their release not likely to return and serve a sentence. Penitentiaries also serve as a place to face punishment when one has committed a crime as well as encourage any type of personal reform for their actions. Penitentiaries are especially used to protect innocent people from these one who have committed crimes (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011). American prisons have two different types of models.
However, it is therefore known, an isolated incident, but has the virtue, besides benefiting the abused, of appealing to people generally, if not indifferent to this problem, rather has the conception of justice as an act of revenge and repair. therefore necessary to work in this field and in the state in this field and the Ombudsman is doing a good job, to realize that that our prisons are venues rehabilitation centers and human degradation and abuse. Punishment n our society we can see that today in many prisons do not have adequate resources for proper rehabilitation when it comes to this we can see that the inmates when they finish their sentences again commit the same crimes or sometimes stronger leading to these re-enter the prison without being properly help to enable them to join the community and is supposed to be. Today,
If we focus on these we can keep the convicts from relapse into their old ways, and truly be successful in community programs and rehabilitation. Restriction are important when you at probation and the community program. Restriction is need to reinforce the idea that their current freedom is a privilege, and at any given time when they make the decision to do the wrong thing it can be taken away. So
Thus they appear to be above the law . Moreover other celebrities may be in contact with the policy or law makers hence being safeguarded by them .3 ) The goal that a progressive society should have toward s criminal justice system is to jail or rehabilitate individuals who commit crime Many scholars have researched between the two and find out which appears to effective and efficient , and concluded that this will only depend on their effects to victims or offenders and furthermore on the fiscal and social impact to the society . Rehab will be a fairy way of correcting the youth as compared to jail since they be corrected and be taught how to be become responsible people in the society through training and teaching 4 ) Media play a major role in the way celebrity case is handled when caught breaking the law . This may be through updating the public on their progress of the case so that citizens of a country can see that law is served equally to all people and also this publicity is a caution to other celebrity . Hence fairness
The punishment should also increase for repeat offenders. The victims and victim’s families should be able to feel some kind of peace and closure from the punishment given to the criminal. As a future juvenile probation officer, justice does not mean punishment. Yes, there may be some punishment involved, but rehabilitation means more. As juvenile crime rose throughout the 1980’s and 90’s, public policy makers had little choice but to begin implementing more punitive sanctions based on the offense that was committed rather than the offenders characteristics.
The sheer threat of punishment is not enough to ensure the smooth functioning of a law-abiding society, as countless examples of tyranny and police states illustrate. Those predisposed towards crime are usually people, with backgrounds of poverty, alienation, and violence, and a majority of criminals aren't the sort to stop and weigh the consequences of their actions anyway. Therefore the best deterrent to crime is good education, loving our neighbors, by being friendly with them, and sharing in their sorrows and helping them out in their difficulties. It is chiefly our neighbor's
Assuming that young, petty lawbreakers may be deterred from braking laws, simply by introducing the possibility of a public flogging, has some flaws to it. Jacoby neglected to bring up, what I would call the perfect argument to this topic. People who already intentionally commit crimes in today’s American society are fully aware of the possible repercussions for their actions. Despite this knowledge they continue to commit crimes that could land them in jail. I could argue that even more crime could result in effect to fewer prisonable offences and more humane forms of corporal punishment.
This theory basically states that someone violates the law based on any number of reasons to include greed, need, lust, anger, jealousy, and vanity. This theory was formed in a time period when the fear of satanic possession was dominant. Cruel methods of punishment were used to deal with crime doing this time, Classic Criminology was developed with the thought process that people do things that bring them pleasure and help them to avoid pain. The purpose of punishment based on this theory was to prevent criminal offenses altogether, persuade the criminal to commit lesser offenses if it was going to happen, to persuade the criminal to use the least amount of force necessary, and for the criminal to commit as cheap of a crime as possible. The basic elements of this theory are that people have free will, crime is attractive due to the possible big pay off, crime can be deterred if the punishment is worse than the crime, and that the punishment must be severe and swift enough to convince criminals that crime does not pay.