Terror Management Theory

752 Words4 Pages
We can conceptualize the reasons of why we have behaviors that seem inherently driven, but the fact is we are conditioned to a sense of fear. Our humanistic behavior is provoked and maintained by fear of mortality, also known as Terror Management Theory. This emotion- fear is a vulnerability that reflects our innate anxiety of consequences, often leading to death. Fear is ubiquitous. This motivates us both consciously and unconsciously to act accordingly to various situations. We do things out of obligation in response to fear and we employ defense mechanisms to avoid any negative aspects. The ways of which human kind attempts to instill a positive outlook on life and themselves can be created though self esteem. Those who have high self-esteem are likely to have a positive outlook on life and most likely will have a sense of purpose. That outlook on life which one has is aligned with how they perceive death. Terror Management Theory (TMT) suggests that many aspects of human behavior are centered on raising self-esteem and a universal drive to defeat death by living up to the standards set by society (Pyszczynski, Greenberg and Solomon, 1999). TMT has been derived from Ernest Becker’s empirical research, whom presumably argued that human action is taken to ignore or avoid death. Becker’s theoretical framework for “Terror Management Theory” has two important objectives: self-esteem and culture. In the film Flight from Death: the Quest for Immortality, Solomon and colleagues explains how we as society are psychologically intolerant to death. We have established defense mechanisms that distinguish our individual beliefs and those are different from us, also as being maintained through culture. We can understand how culture provides meaning in a sense of where we came from and giving us a personal sense of value or importance. But because the fear of death

More about Terror Management Theory

Open Document