Tennessee vs. Garner

498 Words2 Pages
Tennessee vs. Garner The Tennessee vs. Garner case involved the shooting of an unarmed suspect to a burglary. The officer knew the suspect was unarmed and shot and killed him while he was trying to escape. I will discuss whether or not there would be a time to use deadly force against an unarmed suspect. “If an officer believes that the suspect poses a threat to society than it is not unreasonable to use deadly force to prevent escape.” (Tennessee vs. Garner, 2012 Copyright). What actually happened the night that the unarmed young man was shot and killed? On October 3rd, 1974, at about 10:45pm police were called to the scene of a burglary in process. When police arrived a young man was running to a fence. The officer called out and identified himself as the police and yelled for the suspect to stop. The officer used a flashlight and was able to see the suspect was unarmed. When the suspect turned around and began to climb the fence, the officer shot and hit the suspect in the head. “The officer described the suspect as about 5’5 and between 17 and 18 years of age.” (Justia). Garner argued that the officer’s description did not sound like that of a person that posed a threat. Only 10 dollars and the victims purse was found on the suspect. Are there any circumstances in which it would be necessary to use deadly forced on an unarmed assailant? There are many instances in which using deadly force on an unarmed suspect would be reasonable. If the suspect comes at the officer as if he is going to cause harm, deadly force could be used to protect that officer. As we all know a person does not have to be armed to seriously injure someone. If the suspect is on a rampage and is trying to flee it would be necessary to use deadly force because the suspect could hold hostages or even seriously injure someone in a car accident trying to get away. In these types of

More about Tennessee vs. Garner

Open Document