Television Is Good Or Bad For Children

1794 Words8 Pages
Television is good or bad for children Michael Plunkett English 111, GEH, Wed 6 p.m. Mrs. B.J. Fairchild-Newman Ivy Tech Community College November 16, 2011 The average American by the age of 18 has viewed 200,000 acts of violence on television, 40,000 of those being murders (Television & Health, n.d. p.2). There is a large debate over whether television is good or bad for our children. Ever since the invention of television people have been debating the effects of commercials, violence, and ratings on our society and the influences it has on our health. In the 1950’s companies started using children’s programming and the benefits that television could presumably bring to the family as selling points for their television sets (Children and television, n.d. p.1). By 1951 up to 27 hours of networks’ schedules was dedicated to children’s programs which continued radio’s tradition of action-adventure themes, and a pattern of late afternoon and evening broadcasts. Early on the networks used movies as their program staples but this was lessened in favor of half-hour live-action shows like The Lone Ranger, and lassie, and host/puppet shows like Howdy Doody, and Fran and Ollie. By the mid 1950’s these programs had found their place on Saturday morning, and by the end of the decade the thirty-minute, once a week format was established (Children and television, n.d. p.1). The debate over whether television plays a role in whether or not our children will be violent has been raging for a long time as well as the effects it has on adults as well. The fact that by the age of 18 the average American child will witness 200,000 acts of violence is very alarming to me, but does not prove that it makes children any more or less prone to go out and re-create these acts in real life. Many acts of violence are done by the “good guys”, which children have been taught to
Open Document