Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is also not taken into account with income per capita; this means that the cost of living in each country is not accounted for so development may appear better in some countries than it actually is. Income per capita can be used to measure the economic and social development, but not any of the other factors of development, such as environmental development. Development can be further measured by income inequality. This can be a useful measurement as it shows the differences between the rich and poor. The greater the inequality, gap between the rich and poor, the worse developed the country is.
When the government prevents prices from adjusting naturally to supply and demand, efficiency is improved in the economy. ANSWER: F TYPE: T KEY1: D SECTION: 2 OBJECTIVE: 7 RANDOM: Y [cxviii]. A market economy cannot possibly produce a socially desirable outcome because individuals are motivated by their own selfish interests. ANSWER: F TYPE: T KEY1: D SECTION: 2 OBJECTIVE: 7 RANDOM: Y [cxix]. While the invisible hand cannot guarantee efficiency, it is better at guaranteeing equity.
But not even President Obama’s $33 billion tax credit was not enough to substantially increase jobs in the market. To the contrary, it has gotten more difficult and complicated to keep the job market growing at a satisfactory pace. King claims ”If the Great Recession has taught us anything, it is that planning for the future by saving more and enacting policies that sustain economic growth are what will keep the American Dream alive.” Many economists believe that rather than having the resources divided among different competing groups, individuals should be giving unregulated economic freedom to selfishly improve their lot and eventually their efforts would trickle down to the rest of society. Though this thought actually worked for America for many decades, the global markets no dictate what control we have over the
There is no way to calculate actual members, as these fellowships do not keep attendance (anonymous) records. Although some growth may be attributed to, increased population, availability of information, (such as the internet), and improved public transportation, it is reasonable to deduct that if this approach to recovery from addiction were not affective it would not prosper. While this data is convincing there is still a long running debate regarding the effectiveness of these programs for “every” addicted person. Three of the most prominent disagreements are; the concept
What evidence suggests that Cash Connection’s strategy and business model are ethical and beneficial to customers and to society at large? What evidence suggests the company’s strategy and business model are neither ethical nor beneficial to customers and that the entire payday lending industry has few if any redeeming qualities? * There are many evidences suggest that Cash Connection’s strategy and business model are ethical and beneficial to customers and to society at large. Cash Connections is not breaking any legal laws which may lend people to think they are ethical, but does Cash Connection pass the moral test is the question. Cash Connection as well as other lending organizations is taking advantage of the hard times individuals have fallen on but at the same time the lending industry is beneficial in that it provides more than 150,000 jobs and contributes up to $10 billion to the U.S. gross domestic product.
Using named examples, assess the advantages and disadvantages of top down and bottom up development strategies (15 marks) Development is the ways in which a country seeks to develop economically and to improve the standards of living for its inhabitants. Numerous development strategies both top down and bottom up can be used by countries to help them progress. However, while these may be advantageous in certain areas, not all strategies are as effective everywhere and thus problems can arise with top down and bottom up development schemes. Top down strategies are generally capital-intensive and often conducted by the government. The main criticism of these schemes is the fact that the money which is supposedly meant to aid the poorest people in the country who are most in need is actually diverted to those who are richer instead.
I believe whole-heartedly that government intervention as well as taxation should be justified when these industries are not providing optimal amount of a good for society’s well-being. When a tax is put on someone’s favorite soda, they are either going to buy a similar drink that is untaxed or not buy the drink at all. Typically, the body does not account for liquid calories as much as it does food calories, therefore making it easier to drink more sugared drinks. Usually people do not to feel full from a sugary drink, which makes it less likely to buy foods that will replace the taxed beverage. They would be more likely to drink one or two more cans of soda rather than eating a snack or a full meal.
2. Do increases in gross domestic product necessarily translate into improvements in the welfare of citizens? Explain your answer. A: GDP growth by itself is not a good enough indicator of improving quality of life because there is many other factors that influence quality of life. GDP growth in itself is not enough to indicate quality of life.
To play their intended roles successfully, public organizations must also be structured with such interactions in mind. The supporters still argue that private firms are more efficient than government because of balanced economies, higher labor productivity, and fewer level restrictions. We can say that the nature of government services makes many of them inappropriate for privatization. Because of lack of information, contracting may involve hidden costs; therefore the need for monitoring is demanded. In some places for example, creating the competition necessary for effective contracting is impossible, so in practice privatization is more complicated than it
are not expected to pay back an equivalent amount, as they would with balanced reciprocity − generalized reciprocity, in turn seems to work best with, or even require, egalitarian social organization − minimal inequality, minimal hierarchy − Most other kinds of societies do not live in equality. Why not? − hierarchy has NOT been typical for humans, who have been foragers for 98% of our existence (or more, depending on how you count) − so how did this aberration of hierarchical society come to be? − the historical process is a question for archaeologists − the answer is not clear − but large, settled groups were apparently a necessary step − and with few possible exceptions, these generally appear to have been possible only with farming to support them − how is social inequality or hierarchy socially constructed? − that is, how is it maintained and instilled in each new member born into the