Tad O Maley Case

520 Words3 Pages
1. Which were the key characteristics of the buyout industry in the US in 2005? The U.S. LBO industry had evolved substantially from the roaring days of the 1980’s where it was easy to find and acquire companies that were underperforming or underleveraged and could provide a quick turnaround opportunity. Now, companies had learned how to operate more efficiently so it was harder to find potential targets. Additionally, even if a good potential target was identified, the change in federal regulations had made obtaining the necessary leverage a challenging task, forcing LBO firms to put up over 30% of the buyout in equity, thereby reducing the possible returns. Although the banking market had tightened regulation and made debt harder to come by, equity from investors was pouring in. 2004 had been a record-breaking year in terms of dollars invested as well as transactions completed, and 2005 was on track to continue increasing those figures. Purchase price for companies were hovering at about 7x EBITDA, the highest since 1999. Some of the reasons for this increase in deal size include: • Firms were able to raise a lot of money and felt the need to put that money to work • Firms were becoming industry-focused, developing operational expertise to help their targets after the buyout process • Firms were diversifying into other markets such as Europe, Asia and India, where LBOs still presented attractive returns such as the ones seen in the US circa 1980’s • U.S. private equity firms were establishing international offices to deploy this excess of funds, sometimes “bidding up” or overpaying just to ensure capital deployment 2. How Empire is positioned with the industry? Why it has been so successful? Empire is an “old-line” group that has built a strong name for itself in the private equity industry due to very successful partnerships. They built this

More about Tad O Maley Case

Open Document