Primary Source: Aristotle-The Athenian Constitution Define “demes”. Demes were local neighborhoods that were doubted to be created by Cleisthenes, but rather made the basis of his reforms and the root of political organization. As the number of citizens expanded, the demes became more deme-ocratic (democracy). Describe how Cliesthenes “beat” Isagoras and Cleomenes. Cliesthenes won over the people with promises of more citizen rights.
By having one house, this will ensure equality within the states. It is better to be equal than have one side to carry all the weight. On the other hand, the Virginia Plan, as I said before, is only based on the population and includes a bicameral legislature. It would not be fair for both of the houses to have representatives based on the number of people. Why couldn’t they even let just one house to satisfy the smaller states?!
Although the status of the country was far different for Johnson that it was for Roosevelt, the principles each of them based their national plans on were parallel. Both men wanted to unite the community behind leadership and lift the dredges of society up without bringing anyone down. Johnson aimed to continue Roosevelt’s push towards a more equal and balanced society, and his methods were very similar to those used to implement the New
The New World Times How will the constitution affect the presidential elections? In terms of this, the constitution will affect the elections because the federalists and the anti-federalists will oppose to vote for the right representative but because that the representative comes from that class…… the classes will only vote for their representative. This attempt will trouble the nation with election issues and pretty soon… the constitution will be abandoned set America for a monarchy. Editor’s opinion In my opinion the U.S constitution provided more detailed political laws that was able to help out the economy itself to prevent form having a dictatorship. However the constitution first needed to be discussed before being passed out
This is one of several reasons for the splitting of powers between the different branches of government and as well as between the states. The population could get involved in “free and fair elections” (Magleby & Light, 2009 Brief Edition, p. 21) to oust those that they felt were abusing their powers of office. The framers also wished to give the majority and the minorities an equal say in the government so that the minorities wouldn’t be deprived of their rights under the new
One of the functions of the HOC is representation. Representation involves the people appointing representatives to make decisions on their behalf, rather than make those decisions themselves. This implies that membership should represent a social cross section of society. The HOC is effective in carrying out this function as in the UK there is strong geographical representation, as all areas are divided up into constituencies whereby constituents elect their representative to be their MP and represent their views in the HOC. However the HOC is not effective in carrying out this function because ethnic minorities are not fairly represented as there are now only 27 MP’s that are from ethnic minority groups, this is not representative of society as a whole.
1. Although Benjamin Franklin’s Plan for the Union was designed for protection and not power, it did have some aspects to it that were more politically and economically motivated. It suggested that a general assembly was to be formed, providing a general and uniform government in the colonies for the first time. This council would not only make military plans and preparations, but also make laws and “levy…general duties, imposts or taxes” on the colonies. This was most likely why the British government did not support the plan, as it would have given the colonists even more power to self govern, and would have allowed the Colonies to have more power of taxation during a time where Britain was beginning to levy more taxes on them.
Rome dealt with immigrants and intruders from the north and south. A few of these intruders and immigrants were given citizenships. The political structure for the Romans required two political parties in the Senate to have representatives. The upper class was represented by the patricians, while the lower-class, or everyone who was not a patrician, was represented by the plebeians. Political parties were not used by the government in Greece, but they did believe that if the public officials were elected by popular vote then there was a great possibility that the richest and most famous citizen would be elected.
Another just as important contribution was the development of a constitution. The idea of everyone having equal treatment was as well an ingenious idea that was created by them that would later influence democracy. Many other important things were also contributed to democracy but those were just the minimal and the basic few. The Greeks contributed a lot to democracy. An impeccable example of this is that, “Athenian leader Cleisthens introduced a constitution or plan to govern.”(Mejia’s notes).
The Articles after a few short years would eventually be replaced by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Constitution replaced the Articles because they contained more weaknesses than strengths, which forced the colonists to get rid of them and create a new document; the strengths of the Articles were few. Replacing the Articles pleased the people with the legislature because it gave them a voice in the government. The fear of the central government holding too much power was very concerning and consequently resulted in creating a governing document that left many important powers to the states. The Articles provided a unicameral structure for the new government and established a league of friendship among the 13 independent states.