Mostly the Anti-Federalists thought that the Constitution created too strong of a central government. They felt that the Constitution did not create a Federal government, but a single national government. They were afraid that the power of the states would be lost and that the people would lose their individual rights because a few individuals would take over. As a result, they proposed The Bill of Rights, to make sure the citizens were protected by the law. They believed that no Bill of Rights would be equal to no check on our
They believed that each state should have a self governed, and independent. Anti-Federalists also argued that there was no bill of rights, and the Congress and executive branch held too much power. But mostly the lack of a bill of rights was the focus of the Anti-Federalist against ratifying the Constitution. But Federalists on the other hand favored the creation of a strong federal government that would more closely unite the states as one large, continental nation of a strong federal government that would more closely unite the states as one large, continental nation. The Federalists like the separation of powers into three independent branches protected the rights of the people.
He though people could make their own good smart decisions. Jefferson was an anti-federalist, being that he started the republicans and was against the federalist, which Hamilton was. The constitution was used by Jefferson a lot because he wanted to limit the power of the central government and he wanted the power to be based around the legislative branch. Jefferson not just wanted wealthy people to do things but everyone because he knew that people had good enough knowledge. To conclude Jefferson did not want a strong central government.
3). Some cons to democracy are that there is not always full agreement among the men in a Democratic government. In a democratic government, it is much easier to be corrupted than would be an absolute monarchy. Another very prominent for of government in the 18th and 19th century was absolutism. Absolutism was favored by some because it put all the power in the hands of one person instead of in the hands of many different people.
However, it has often been said of Henry, 'No man has ascended to the throne with such a lack of financial experience and resources as Henry VII.' S. B. Chrimes. I think Henry was successful in increasing wealth of the crown, this is because Henry used ordinary revenue fairly well, for example the crown lands. These were this kings most important source of revenue. Henry VII had more crown lands than any previous king and some lands had been confiscated under the acts of attainder meaning more money for the crown.
Under this no monarch, king or other form of government had the right to infringe on these rights and harm peoples’ liberties and freedoms. Another notion concerned the equality of all before the law and in government. It is important to note, however, that during this time period “all” simply referred to white males. The lower class of France found these two ideas especially enchanting, since they were unequal in both politics and society. The colonies, however, found
At the end of the American Revolution the Articles of Confederation established an Anti-Federalist paradise in the United States. A weak league of friendship was formed between each state, angering Federalists who sought a stronger central government and causing political, economic and social problems. Shay’s Rebellion, inability to collect taxes and the worthless state currency were all problems that lead to the formation of a new constitution. After becoming free from the tyrannical rule of the British crown the Anti-Federalists were hesitant to establish a strong central government. This set into motion the forming of the Articles of Confederation which created a weak bond between states and a congress with essentially no power to put any law into motion.
This power went directly to the people, not only that of the upper class. In America, citizens are accustomed to their government having the responsibility of serving their needs rather than people serving their rulers. Originally, the king could take rights away without question. In contrast, the American Constitution limited power of the government over the individual, The Bill of Rights even protects the individual from the tyranny of the majority. The three branches of government make America immune from too much power to one individual.
Democracy Gone Wrong Democracy can be defined as a system of government by a whole population or all eligible members of a state typically through elected representatives, where as republic can be defined as a state in which supreme power is held by people and their elected representatives and which has an elected or nominated president. Although the founding fathers did not work within a democratic framework the only way the Constitution would pass was because it had to be democratic. The Constitution was made to form a stronger central government, but they didn’t want to represent the common peoples, and did not constitute individual rights. In forming a strong central government, the people wanted to revise the Articles of Confederation
Faction, a problem could not avoid in American society because of the vast different opinions. In favor of republican, James Madison emphasized that the strong Constitution has the control to deal with violence and aggression caused by faction which those in favor of democracy could not because of its instability government. Furthermore, in the federalist no.51 he stated that the Constitution’s separation of power also helps mitigate the problem of factionalism. Believing in pluralist theory that power is relatively broadly distributed among many more or less organized interest groups in society, and the fear of majoritarian rule, James Madison one more time convinced that the Constitution will mitigate the problem of factionalism by diving