When most casual readers first skimmed over this article, they might be impressive because they browsed Jeff Jacoby’s essay without thinking and with no doubt. The careless readers might also unconsciously agree with his opinions since his argument seems strong and logical. However, if they read the article again and again with second thought carefully, they will find out that his claim is doubtful since Jacoby uses too much pathos, does not give proper statistics, and lack of giving contrary contend. Although Jeff Jacoby shows many disadvantages and flaws of imprisonment to convince readers of his side, he presents some statements based on his emotion without thinking objective. So, I should argue that Jacoby uses too many his own feelings about the dissatisfaction of imprisonment, which makes his claim weak and not credible.
By using many quotes, statistics, and descriptive details Clarke makes the writing complete. It’s as if he gives a little taste of everything, but that miniscule amount is sufficient to feed one’s imagination. Clarke really makes a homerun, his purpose to demonstrate how well Kennedy’s speech was and how/why it was successful, also to demonstrate the genuine president that Kennedy was; in which he clearly accomplishes. Personally never paid much attention to any president’s speech nor wanted to read it, but after reading “Why JFK’s Inaugural Succeeded”, the motivation and very enthusiasm to read Kennedy’s speech was unavoidable. Amazingly an author can really engage his/her audience, but that really takes a lot.
In my opinion, dramatic irony was added because Creon is slightly arrogant character. I predicted that he would be disappointed in him and that he will get what he deserves for being so evil to the people of his country. Another example is when Creon finds out that Antigone disobeyed his law. King Creon got so angry when the Choragus said, “I have been wondering, King: can it be that the gods have done this” (1077). The Choragus provides
That before we know it our appliances will be smarter than us one day and that’s not how man intended life to be; humans are supposed to be on top. Not being able to use today’s technology rings in Barry’s purpose. Technology has gone wild and he makes it very clear with several examples. His ability to discredit these technologic advances brings credit to his point. One can always refute anything they’d like, but to be effective, one needs to have appropriate facts for back-up and a dominating style that brings it all together.
He lays everything down in front of them to see. This kind of honesty and sincerity that he shows to the people is a new form of persuasion. Nixon’s persuasion skills made this speech a successful one, which has stuck with people even today. He used his words effectively, and did the job of refuting most if not all of the questions presenting themselves because of the funds that were donated. His final thoughts that he leaves with the people reinforce his main points, and put his full support behind his decisions and his running mate Eisenhower.
There is a saying, “Money is the root of all evil.” This is true if the money is obtained through ill-gotten ways. What happened to Tom Walker is symbolic of what can happen to any human consumed by greed. He or she will lose their soul to the obsession. There were many important themes present in this story that relate to choices we make and the consequences that comes with it. Money and material things do not truly satisfy a person's life or make a person happy.
Some believe if it not for his assassination Huey would have tried to force his way into office again. Huey loved being in charge, he felt that he was the only person that could actually deliver results. People could also jump to conclusions that Huey Long was
As I lisened again and again, I noticed I said "ok now" a lot and awesome too.Not only did I say it a lot, but sometimes it was incorrect. For example, when I was introducing Captain America my sudent had not even sared with the presentation and I wa aready saying "wow,it is awesome"I should have said it at the end. I also noticed that some of my pronunciation was wrong, and eventhough it was not accurate from what I heard, my students understood me just fine. Despite they understood me, I know I should still practice my pronunciation. One thing that I also noticed was that the things some of them said sounded rehearsed.
I do not believe this statement is true. I believe in a lot of cases this may be true, but not always. I think it depends on the client and what there individual needs are. A personalised script allows for more person centred approach and in so cases is needed. However in many cases this is not possible.
The scapegoating theory states that people blame others for their own failures. Authoritarian personality theory explains that a certain personality type is like to be prejudiced. The personality type that is most likely to be prejudiced is said to be developed from experiencing harsh discipline in early childhood. This theory is widely controversial and many people do not find it very credible. The third theory is the exploitation theory which explains how people use others unfairly for economic advantage.