He states, “all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.” Here he appeals to ethos by showing what he feels everyone, and shows that he cares about every ones happiness and freedom. This then gives him respect and also is persuading the audience that this man understands and respects each one of us. The use of pathos, the emotional connection to the audience, gave a sense of feel and transported the message and meaning to the audience. Everyone was touched in one way or another. Whether they recalled some of the founding fathers, or the heroes that fought for America, or they connected
Watch your character; it becomes your destiny. -- Frank Outlaw Real change comes from within. It doesn't come from hacking at the leaves of attitude and behavior with quick fix personality ethic techniques. It comes from striking at the root -- the fabric of our thought, the fundamental, essential paradigms, which give definition to our character and create the lens through which we see the world. -- Stephen Covey If one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and endeavors to live the life, which he has imagined, he will meet with a success unexpected in common hours.
In the two extracts Benedick shows two very different sides to himself. At the start of act 1 scene 1 he does nothing but joke around and insult Beatrice, and having the pleasure of sharing his thoughts on marriage and women. In act 2 scene 3 Benedick starts to consider what he has heard about himself and expresses his thoughts much differently towards Beatrice. Benedick then changes his ways of doing things and takes life more seriously. In the beginning of act 1 scene 1 Benedick shows to be rude and arrogant.
I'll take it out of you. Who told you you might meddle with such hifalut'n foolishness, hey? -- who told you you could?" (Twain 26) Pap couldn’t stand how well Huck was doing without him, "Starchy clothes -- very. You think you're a good deal of a big-bug, don't you?"
I think he played the best role of them all because he acted the very way I thought Mr Birling would act. From start to finish Mr Birling has a variation of emotions
confidentiality, expectations etc. I demonstrated respect for George by sharing my ethos. That everyone is their own expert. On some level, understanding where their problems lie, as well as having the ability and knowledge to resolve them. Roger’s describes this as the actualising tendency, the motivational force that drives us to be ‘the-best-we-can-be’.
Zinn pays tribute to the founding fathers by stating how effective their intentions were to start the American Revolution. British Rule was pure tyranny, and under it, the wealthy prospered and the poverty-stricken citizens continued to be oppressed, financially. In order to make a change, one must act upon his or her belief for results. The founding fathers had made a statement for freedom over British rule, by first negotiating diplomatically, and eventually through tactical warfare. Skeptical of victory, the English colonists that chose to secede from the British-Empire, fought for the destiny of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
He did not deny the presence of racial prejudice in the sugar slave trade, but he said that that racism was a product of slavery, not a reason for it. Williams’ argument that slavery allowed the British economy to undergo its Industrial Revolution is well evidenced, just as his claim that the abolition of slavery was only allowed because slavery was no longer profitable. However, although the strengths of William’s work are undeniable, it is a work in progress. Through his determination to emphasise the economic influence in the abolition of slavery, he undermines and
One of the issues raised in 1984 is the idea that history is mutable or changeable, that truth is what the Party deems it to be, and that the truths found in history are the bases of the principles of the future. Some Fascist German leaders of the time boasted that if you tell a lie loud enough and often enough then people will accept it as truth. The Stalinists perfected this modus operandi by re-writing people and events in and out of history or distorting historical facts to suit the Party's purposes. ‘Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past’ runs the Party slogan in 1984. The government in 1984 uses fear against its people for control over the personal life of the people.
Consequently, Richard Ho, writing for The Harvard Crimson, states that the heroes of Star Wars such as Han Solo and Luke Skywalker have a swashbuckling style while the protagonists of Star Trek such as Captain Picard and Mr. Spock resolve their challenges with science and intellect. David Brin contrasted the moral and political messages of the two works in "Star Wars" despots vs. "Star Trek" populists, characterizing the philosophy of Star Wars as elitist and authoritarian, as compared with the more progressive and