Both Orwell and Dillard are very good at crafting a story from memory. They both use methods of story telling that engages the reader and makes you want to read more. Orwell carefully uses his words to give you as much feeling and thought as you read his story; where as Dillard writes her story in a way that progresses it with just enough information to keep the story fast and interesting. I believe that I write my stories more in the way Dillard does than Orwell. I usually write a story using minimal information and using just enough atmosphere so that you know what is happening as the story progresses.
How does Golding present Piggy and Simon in the novel? Throughout the thought provoking and allegorical novel of ‘Lord of the Flies’ by William Golding there are certain elements of Golding’s ideology that are represented through objects, the weather and most importantly the characters in the novel. During the time in which the novel was written, the war had just been won by the United Kingdom. Golding was disgusted by a lot of the things that went on during the war particularly the horrendous misanthropic Nazi regime and the apathy that the Nazi’s maintained around killing innocent human beings. As a consequence of this, Golding uses some of these horrific happenings to portray a message or even an extremely strong moral point through the setting and characters in particular.
They are not able to escape its “ominous thunder” it’s “howling madness’ nor it’s “senseless volcanic fury”. Harrison describes scenes where the war takes on human characteristics and speaks to the soldiers. As the novel progresses the war become more and more humanised, and seemingly parallels the dehumanisation of the soldiers. Harrison describes the ‘howl of the bombardment’ and machine guns as “coming to life.” The assigning of human characteristics to war impresses up the reader it’s power. We also see that war was created by humans, but we are unable to control to it.
Because America is a haven from violence, the violence under the Taliban in Kabul is even more shocking and sobering. Amir gets a taste of violence when he and Baba are fleeing for Pakistan and Kamal's father commits suicide. However, nothing can prepare him for the extent of violence and suffering in Afghanistann. One of the most graphic accounts is of the stonings at Ghazi Stadium. Like the rapes of Hassan and Sohrab, the event symbolizes the devastation of Afghanistan as a whole, as Afghans once knew it.
“The Awakening” By Kate Chopin Kate Chopin uses many different situations and different settings in the novel “The Awakening” to get her points and aspects of the story across to the readers. Throughout the story Chopin also uses many different literary techniques and situations to explain the characters and their place within the story. Chopin seems to be very specific at points, but also very vague when brining new characters into the story and the meaning behind such characters. From the many different aspects of the story the significance of the ending of the novel seems to be the most important and most interesting within the works writing. Chopin seems to use many different themes and symbols throughout the story to portray Edna’s character and way of life that causes the many problems and difficulties for her.
He seems to be lost within the joy of killing when he says “Another baby next. O one-two-three the murderer inside me rose up hard.” Which Hitler himself became enthralled with soon losing sight of his reasons behind the “exterminations.” It is the last sentence in the last stanza that connects all of the dots. “If only they’d all consented to die unseen gassed underground the quiet Nazi way.” This quote is included to help show the much deeper more literal meaning of this poem. It also adds to the view that the farmer has gone from trying to save his farm from pests to trying to almost wipe the entire species of woodchucks from the earth. It also seems to show that he blames the woodchucks for not going down easily adding to the reader’s view of him becoming completely
Several discrepancies exist between the two men. Author O’Brien never had children, or ever killed a man in war. In addition, writer O’Brian has control over what is told, while character O’Brian tells the stories themselves. These simple little facts separate what is real and fake in the novel and reality. Author O’Brian also confuses the reader by writing his novel as if everything that was told took place in the real world.
Catch 22 is a novel by Joseph Heller that attempts to bring out the ordinariness surrounding wars and battlefields contrary to the most widely assumed notion of heroic acts. The novel attempts to bring out the apparently uneventful aspects of wars and sometimes even negative aspects in a rather humorous and satirical way. The book is divided into forty two chapters that describe different characters and events. The catch 22 situation is presented satirically throughout the novel outlining the difficult situation experienced by solders in battle fields. The novel provides various scenarios that the characters find themselves that depict the catch 22 situation.
Wuthering Heights is notable for its use of multiple narrative voices intricately woven together to effectively tell a complex story that takes place over many years while reinforcing and enhancing some of the themes the novel explores. There are two main narrative voices introduced early on in the novel, those of Lockwood and Nelly but through these characters the narratives of other characters are also heard through a combination of eye witness accounts and the quoting of letters. In this way, the tertiary narratives from main characters connect together to give a more complete account of events. The multitude of perspectives also gives the reader a deeper sense of immersion with a text which has been described as ‘a story of undying elemental passion’ (da Sousa Correa, 2012, p. 351). To access the thoughts and feelings of the main actors in the novel is to vicariously experience their passions and so their narratives stand out against the more objective narratives of Lockwood and Nelly as well as offering more potential for discussion with other readers who may feel more sympathy for some characters than others.
The story starts with exposition which precedes the introduction but neither of those don't tell us anything about the main point. The author is presented as an observer of everything that had happened. He seems to know everything but he doesn't tell us anything about the main point of the story. He lets us guess it. In the beginning when reading the story we have no clue about what is going to happen next, in fact we get to know about the ^^ ^ ^y problem of this story only in the very middle of the text, even little bit later.