Student Dialogue: Stone Soup

723 Words3 Pages
Barbara Kingslover’s narrative essay Stoned Soup (1995) voices her disappointment on how the nation views divorce and blended families. Kingslover uses her own experiences of a failed marriage, targeting the readers emotions, without being too negative towards nuclear families. The author includes detail to amplify some of the points she wants to get across. The use of logic in the essay also validly support her thesis while clearly seeing her desire for readers to consider both sides of divorce. Kingslover uses as an example of a non-nuclear family cheering on a family member at a soccer game. Though it could be taken as a threat, she states, “I dare anybody to call this a broken home” (Kingslover 177). Bringing to our attention that though they’re not an ideal structured family, they still care very much about each other. She implies that the blended family is equally healthy and happy as any nuclear family. In spite of this essay coming across as a rant, Kingslover explains how society sees “divorced marriages, blended families, gay families, and singles parents [as] failures” (Kingslover 178). She italicizes words like “failure” and phrases such as “children of divorce” to have us assess the negative connotation they possess. No one likes to be labeled yet that’s exactly what society has done to those that have “failed” in marriage. It’s not fair to categorize, and possibly ostracize, children that have no control over matters involving the relationship between parents. Why is it that the media sells the idea of a nuclear family? The divorce rate in this country alone is a staggering 50% of marriages today. This seems to not stop us from kidding ourselves that this is attainable. Even political figures show up with the perfect family unit, selling you the idea that this is what a normal family is. Notwithstanding that the essay could be subjected to
Open Document