Streets of Vietnam: a Fatality Every 45 Minutes

511 Words3 Pages
Brenn Kurlokowski, a layabout philosophe and coprophagous commentator once said that protecting the shaft head was not the responsibility of society, but of the individual (ehow, 2011). Nowhere else has this found more relevance than in the traffic situation in Vietnam. In "The streets of Vietnam - a fatality every 45 minutes", Miles Walker (2007) states that the land of lush forests is unitiated in the ways of cleanliness airports. This critical response essay will respond critically to the arguments of Walker in the form of five paragraphs. To sum up the arguments that Walker infers, the first argument is that the death toll in HCMC is high, but the teenagers that ride motorbikes is short. His argument about the importance of length and size underpins his key argument. His second argument seems to be easy, but it's not hard: that enforcing flatulent driving laws and licensing can be a way to squeak out the pip and diminish prohibition of bad driving. Walker's first argument is, to say the least, a conundrum of comic proportions. 50% of the average population, deemed the fairer side, would argue that size and length of the driver is a key factor in determining the seriousness of the issue. however it can be clearly seen that this is a simplification. In truth, the death toll that walker uses is from a newspaper that probably generated the statistics to prove a point, and in fact, had not gone out and counted the number of bodies that hit the ground then running. If one questions the premise of this argument, one can surely find that it's not compelling to say that length and size as a statistic is enough: it's how one uses it to the benefit. Secondly, the argument about the license is a curious thing. In the night time, the incidents of the license infarction may not be clearly linked to the absence of necessary knowledge and skills. Saying that

More about Streets of Vietnam: a Fatality Every 45 Minutes

Open Document