Starbucks Case Analysis

558 Words3 Pages
Starbuck Case Starbucks has a multidomestic strategy. They focus on differentiating their product and services to adapt to local markets. Starbuck is decentralized to allow the tailoring of their product and to respond rapidly. Starbucks has products that were adapted for specific countries. For example the green tea latte for the Japanese market. In addition each store atmosphere is slightly different depending on which country you are in. However the cost of Starbucks ’products is relatively the same in every store throughout the world. Starbucks has embarked on this strategy because it is in a mature stage of its lifecycle. Founded over 20 years ago Starbucks has experienced rapid growth which has now slowed down drastically. Starbucks had nowhere else to expand in the US and had begun to cannibalize existing locations. Starbucks wanted to extend it product’s life cycle. When a product has reached the maturity stage in its home country, the company has the option of expanding into a new market that has a greater demand potential for product. Another reason Starbuck chose this strategy is to increase market size. Expanding its presence in other countries automatically increases the company’s scale of operations (attaining economies of scale). This strategy allows strong integration across various businesses as well as standardization leads to higher economies of scale, which lowers costs. The risk with this strategy is it increase company’s structure cost due to adaption and sometime the adaption may backfire. The people in that country may not respond to the product. Also the optimal degree of local adaptation evolves over time. It is influenced by media, income, and many more factors. This type of strategy limits ability to adapt to local markets and concentration of activities may increase dependence on a single facility. In the case of Starbuck all

More about Starbucks Case Analysis

Open Document