The vvolunteer described the warden as a cruel one, and so as he began to imitate him, he became equally as cruel. The reactions of the volunteers whowere asigned the roles of prisoners were particurarly traumatic. It was just three days before th first volunteer suffered a breakdown and had to be released from the experiment. Another volunteer soon replaced the one who was released but he quickly fel into mental deterioration as well. If I were to play a part in this experiment I believe it would not be long before I had a breakdown myself.
Another ethical problem accrue when there is an invasion of privacy of the participants, like when the prisoners were stripped naked. Zimbardo concluded that the power of an environmental setting or situational circumstances are strong forces in shaping participants' behavior in the experiment, no matter what their personalities or behavioral habits in real life are. All participants acted in the experiment as if was a real prison, they disassociated them selves from the reality, that this is just a research, and their personalities just dissolved in the new role either as a prisoner or a guard. They defined themselves based on how others saw them. I think the stereotype about how a prison life should be and how a prisoner or a
The guards afterwards confessed that they had become a person they were not. The participants realized through this experiment that they were capable of inhumane behavior, which they had never imagined they could ever engage in. This could be best explained by the concept of cognitive dissonance. Through cognitive dissonance, a person experiences a change of beliefs that can often be an important part of their identity, due to environmental changes. These prison guards claimed that they would have never known they could be capable of such aggressive and cruel behavior.
For the prisoners, they became depressed, psychologically distraught, dehumanized, and powerless. On the other hand, the guards made the most of their power to maintain prison standards by way of harassment, pornographic behaviors, and mind-bending tactics. In both situations, there was a incident of a rumor of a prison riot with didn’t occurred but aggravated the guards, which lead to more humiliation. The reality of these particular events is the simple fact that what occurred at Abu Ghraib was real, as for the Stanford Prison Experiment was nothing more than a research study on human behavior. When the Stanford Prison Experiment came to it’s end, the guards didn’t receive any form of punishment for their actions.
Even though prisoners are still stripped of many rights, federal and state laws put protections into place for inmates. This case study brings to light two right afford by law, the right to not be attacked by guards and the right to medical treatment. Which, if any, of the inmate’s rights were violated? According to "The Rights of Individuals in Prison" (2012), “The right to not endure physical attacks from guards, unless the guard is acting in good faith to control or otherwise regulate a precarious situation”. Due to the correctional officers not being properly trained on how to breach a prisoner’s cell and properly extract the unruly inmate may be considered a violation of the inmate’s rights.
This is a condensed part of the code of ethics taken by medical professionals. Not all the Nazi doctors during that time had bad intentions or deserved to be labeled as “killers”. Some of them took mercy on many prisoners in a more indirect way. They would diagnose them with a less severe diagnosis than it really was, releasing patients to their families, or keeping them in university hospitals instead of sending them to state hospitals. These doctors were in a no-win situation because Hitler was ordering all people that fell in a certain category to be executed or become one of the Guinea pigs for the experiments.
The Swedish population feels that there are those who are dangerous to society and want them locked up securely; however, they also note there is a need "to stick with our philosophy of humanization" (Alvarez, 2005). The escapees, by the way, were soon recaptured but not before the resignation of the Prison Service director; there were also calls for the Justice Minister, Thomas Rodstroem, to resign but he remained in his position (Alvarez, 2005). He did however begin a "comprehensive review of Sweden's prison system," including plans to build a "bunker-style prison for the most violent offenders," though the idea has since been dropped (Alvarez, 2005). The escapes in 2004 were the first made "from Sweden's maximum-security prisons in a decade," and Alvarez suggests that they are due to a "change in the prison population" (Alvarez, 2005). Sweden's prisons, like those in the U.S., are filled to capacity and holding inmates who are "savvier, bolder, more organized and more violent than in the past" (Alvarez, 2005).
This would perhaps help their system with putting people that need to be in prison. With implementing the correctional system of the United States, they would not have to resort to imprisonment all the time. They could use other methods that would rehabilitate their offenders. Some of those methods could include community supervision, treatment programs. This would cut down on head count of their prison.
The definition of solitary confinement is, “a special form of imprisonment in which a prisoner is isolated from any human contact, with the exception of prison staff.” People who get put into solitary confinement have committed very bad crimes and barely see the light of day. This is a horrible way of spending years of your life. If a person is found innocent and they have spent their days in solitary confinement they should definitely be compensated more because how they were treated. A person should receive a one
"The physical structure of the prison, combined with prison security procedures and armed security personnel, create a strict and intimidating environment. An initial visit on your own will ensure a more controlled emotional reaction and give you some time to think about how to explain this setting and its procedures to the child" (Wright & Seymour, p. 57). Be prepared for disappointments. Just like ordinary visits, things do not always go as planned. For example, you may travel to the prison and then be unable to visit the inmate because of security concerns unrelated to the inmate you're visiting (Wright & Seymour).