Standardized Tests Negative or Positive

691 Words3 Pages
Premises: 1) Standardized test are not standardized. 2) The consequences for schools not making the grade are very unforgiving. 3) They only measure a small portion of a student’s abilities. Standardized Tests Negative or Positive In the beginning, the intent of standardized testing was to be helpful by producing information that teachers and school systems could use to improve the educational structure for students. Although standardized tests have been around for a very long time, there is still a mountain of controversy surrounding, if they are helpful or a hindrance to our elementary and secondary school students. Upon researching the positives and negatives of these types of tests, I have concluded that standardized tests have a negative effect on education. Standardized tests are developed by states independently; therefore, each states test is different from another’s. According to Webster’s dictionary the word, standardize means, to make standard or uniform. Let us look back in history to see how our leaders have tried to reform our educational structure. This all started in the mid-1800s with Horace Mann’s introduction of the standardized tests to the Boston school system. The concept of using exams is to gain “objective information about the quality of teaching and learning in urban schools, monitor the quality of instruction, and compare schools and teachers with each school,” says Gallagher. In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson passed the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as his “War on Poverty.” This act also was supposed to help students in low-income areas obtain better education opportunities nationwide. In an effort to restructure

More about Standardized Tests Negative or Positive

Open Document