As a result, the deeper biases reﬂected in sensationalism often leave citizens confused about issues which forces them to deconstruct this alternately managed and frenzied news in order to make sound judgements about their society and government. Without question, money necessitates an effective campaign and election, and a lot of it. The amount of money that can be raised and spent dominates and facilitates campaigns and elections. Afﬁrmative advantages of possessing an abundance of money can enable an otherwise unknown candidate heard and seen. Money buys name recognition and organizational support, hence the reason that so much money is spent by candidates and their parties on media related campaigning.
Interim Analysis Report CAMPAIGN FINANCE At a time when much of the world is emulating American values and institutions, too many Americans have lost confidence in their political system. They are turned off by a partisan debate that often seems to revolve not around opposing philosophies but around contending sets of interest groups. They believe that our current system for financing campaigns gives disproportionate power to wealthy individuals and groups and exerts too much influence over legislative and regulatory outcomes. Americans on both side of the aisle agree that the country faces pressing problems, from climate change, to health care reform, to the national debt. But none of this issue can be resolved, until we address the problems with the current political system itself.
The endorsement groups offer bribes and ask for unnecessary promises to the politicians running for office. The temptation of falling into these traps is monstrous. According to Obama, these politicians feel that if they do not accept these bribes or arguments then they will lose out on endorsement deals as well as votes. Taking endorsements are not bad in anyway. However, a company endorses a certain individual for reasons such as political similarities or to help promote their product.
This organization uses the power of its huge number of members to raise money to elect candidates they consider to be progressive and defeat those who stand in the way of change. I found myself taking much pause when I read about this particular topic. I am not old enough to remember if politics has always been about who ever raises the most money to make his or her opponent look bad, wins the election. It is rather unsettling that on their website there is a petition to “Take Big Money out of Politics” when this website and the millions of member are in fact “big money”. If this this is something MoveOn practices, I don’t think I can support this part completely.
The sad fact is that the United States system of funding presidential campaigns remains elitist and undemocratic. A public funding system that would make the process more equitable does exist, but is largely unused because it is badly underfunded. In the absence of public funds that would allow them to be competitive, political office seekers depend upon a relative handful of individuals whose large contributions make up the bulk of the money they raise. Special interests by spreading their wealth to all contestants are able to reduce the likelihood that they will be held accountable for their misdeeds. In conclusion, there are various advantages and disadvantages presented on whether campaign financing will ultimatelly benefit.
People who make over $250,000 a year is considered rich. Warren Buffet, one of the richest men in the country, wants to pay more taxes and thinks that his super-rich friends should too. “While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our tax breaks,” Buffet wrote in a Sunday New York Times Op-ed (Bingham). Everyone that lives in America should have to pay taxes. Bill Gates, the richest man in America, agrees that taxes should be raised on the rich.
What are they doing? Because don’t seem like they are doing their job. And also can they fix the fiscal crisis and the falling economy? Well the answer to that would be no! It’s just some more empty promises from wealthy, money hungry officials who just want votes and publicity to tell people how they are going to fix things and it will be different.
It is basically a win for the U.S because we take advantage of people, by promoting investments we know thecountry will never be able to pay back; because of the interest and the amount of the loan.It is amazing how a group of individuals can make so much influence and cheat countries around the globe, and funnel money from the world bank in order to do so. It sadden me how they can damage a country, and how they are taking peoples dignity and culture as well as their lands. This clearly shows how economic growth and development doesn’t benefit everyone in a country, for example the indigenous tribes that were being forced of their land for oil.It seems that governments, big business and the banks will stop at nothing to get what they want. They get away with it because we all live in a state of ignorance. I wonder when we will say enough and demand that these institutions conduct their business with honesty, integrity and complete transparency.It’s no wonder that these countries hate the United States so passionately.
Occupy Wall Street’s Main goal is unknown, however; some of their goals include bank reform, more and better jobs, economic justice, and getting money out of politics. While the goals for their issues may be different, both movements are focused on money, politics, and how our tax dollars are being spent. While the Tea Party movement has turned into a political party, the occupy Wall Street movement is saying they do not want to be associated with any political parties. Moreover from the air, they both look alike, in that there is anger, they are demanding to be heard, and they have legitimate concerns said former Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, whose 2010 re-election bid was hindered by the Tea Party opposing him. Both the tea party and occupy Wall Street movements have been dismissed as not being very important.
They can raise and lower it. If they wanted to make it higher or lower, they could. This is usually the most important piece because people don’t want to pay taxes, even if it is to benefit the country. Having our money taken away is not what people want without good reason. Our representatives have to decide on what the cost of improvement is and if the people really want or need it.