Specific Rhetorical Movements

386 Words2 Pages
Introduction * I will explain the difference between Buddhism and science. * I will talk about interdependence and how we are all interconnected. * I will introduce the text and background of Ricard/Thuan and their knowledge of Science and Buddhism. * Transition by explaining Ricard and Thuans argument. Describe the project/argument * I will explain Ricard and Thuans conversation about Buddhism and science and how they both relate to interdependence. * I will use quotes to state they answer each other’s question related to the two topics. * The authors explain their purpose to explain the importance of interdependence * Their argument is about how our universe is interconnected. * I will compare the argument to Mencius’s text and how they are related…show more content…
* I will show how their conversation relates to the claim because both Ricard and Thuan and knowledge about Buddhism and are able to relate to each other and talk about interdependence Discuss the Specific Rhetorical Moves * I will explain the author’s ethos. Ricard and Thuan have a strong credibility because of their background * I will explain what their intentions because they explain how interdependence relates to science and religion * I will explain how the authors are fair because they answer each other’s questions * The authors project themselves as both experts and an audience because it’s a conversation. * Style: they use common language by the length of the sentences/ paragraphs) * They give an example of Einstein when they talk about the EPR experiment and how “a” correlates with ”b”. Conclusion * I will explain relate the how the paragraphs relate back to the claim * I will explain how the discussion was convincing by quoting examples from the
Open Document