Athens was more worried about the comfort and culture during the time of the military battles. The oligarchy in Sparta put a war like attitude as it's first priority and it met the needs of Ancient Greece. Athens did not have the best form of government because it did not give the citizens of Greece more freedom. The Athenian democracy can not be called a true democracy because there was several flaws in the governement and how it worked. Only the
However Xenophon’s view is not a totally fair one, considering his past military experiences with Spartans, as well as the fact that he was not a Spartan citizen and therefore only knew the official laws laid out to him. The ancient Greeks believed that the world was created perfect, and that every change made it a little worse. This made conservatism fundamental in preventing decay in the world. The Spartans therefore found it essential to live by the laws, which were mainly military based, that the legendary Lycurgus had laid out for them in the first half of the 7th Century. Unlike other Greek states, who were much less rotated around the military and had women responsible for making clothes, the Spartans left that duty for the slave women, so that the higher class women could concentrate on physical training just as much as the men did.
Becoming a governor in his region of Rome wasn’t good enough, he wanted to be crowned king and serve as a dictator for life, something that Rome didn’t have for five hundred years. His need for absolute power, to become greedy and to bring Rome under Monarchy corrupted him and altered his thinking. Instead of thinking about the Roman people, he was thinking about himself, and that made him a bad leader. Another reason that he wasn’t a good leader was that he was weak. Although he appeared to be strong to the commoners, he was seen as weak to his own Senate members, especially Cassius.
The launching of the Great Experiment September 9, 2013 Establishing a durable Government in the 18th Century was very difficult because there was no way to please all of the country which all had different opinions. Americans have failed before with the Articles of Confederation because it did not meet the needs of our nation. There remained disputes between the Americans which led to the division of government; one remained for the American people and the other for the thirteen colonies belonging to Great Britain. The Constitution was also created to test Americans and to see if they could govern themselves without being watched by someone. The American people were in need of a government that would make everyone happy and satisfied.
The helots were the slaves of the Spartiates. However, the helots were not like typical slaves, as they were the product of total state power and could not be sold to other lands. The helots outnumbered the Spartiates in most areas of Sparta, but they often were aware that they could not overwhelm their masters who were full time soldiers. This ideology was exactly what the Spartans wanted the helots to believe, as often the greatest fear for the Spartans was not external military threats, but the possibility of helot rebellions. Often, Spartan foreign policy was dictated by how it would affect the possibility of helot
There were plenty of arguments over what to add or take out so some delegates came up with the idea to abandon the Articles of Confederation and establish a new constitution. I was completely for this new constitution because it would secure our government and people. Many others were against this new idea because it was not fair to the people and could cause a monarchy. Although this is true, the people have more of a say in this new government because they vote to choose our representatives and they can vote to change the representatives or
In Ancient Greece There Was two Major forms of Goverment Obligarchy and Democracy. The city States that best represented each goverment were the Spartans Who Were The Obligarchy goverment and the Athens Who Were The Democracy Goverment. The Athens goverment was fair and Advanced for its time. It did not Meet The needs Of Greeks during the time of military battles. Athens decided to worry more about culture.
It was called direct democracy for the simple fact that the citizens got to choose who their leader would be. Sparta used an oligarchy as a form of government, which means that only a few powerful people rule the government system. Athenians were therefore able to have more say in government elections and could help choose a better candidate to be the king or president because the common people might have more knowledge than the higher up government official whom probably haven’t seen how hard life can be.. Another difference between Athens and Sparta politically is the amount of freedom the citizens were given to speak. In Athens if the citizens don’t like a certain idea or law that is being said, they can speak more openly about if they don’t think the law or idea is right or if they have questions about it. On the other hand in Sparta if you have an idea of your own or do not agree with something that a government official might say during a public debate you have a limited say in it
Pompey was easily exploited and the senators also attempted to strip Caesar of all power. This was an incredibly thing to achieved due to the fact that Rome had operated as a republic for quite a long period and, enabling the senators to take advantage of its constitution loopholes. Taking the power away from the Senate was considered to be non-traditional and that it would threaten the original institution of the republic. However, it was only considered to be an “unwise” decision to the Senate because their corrupted network was revealed to the Roman citizens following Caesar’s reform. Some could argue that Caesar could have been power hungry and attempted to take control of other authorities.
In this system, king and queen were the law of the nation, and most of the people even the assistants of king and queen might be executed at once when they disagreed with the decision of those two leaders. Because of that, none of the people dared to show their comments or give their advice for the decision made by king and queen or the improvement of the kingdom, whether the comments and advice were beneficial to the development of the kingdom or not, and that’s why most of the kingdom in the past were unable to last for a long time. Later on, some people decided to change the political system mainly by getting rid of the rule that everyone has to obey king and queen, and the decisions needed to be voted for by almost all the people in the kingdom, which is called direct democracy. It’s such a great idea at that time to deal with the nation or kingdom, but why did James Madison chose the republic, as well as called representative democracy, instead of direct democracy without hesitation? Well, let’s back to the republic’s conception again.