Lesson 1: Question Compare and contrast two classic definitions of democracy – representative and participatory democracies. Discuss Aristotle’s view of democracy. What are the key parts of Schumpeter’s definition of democracy? Which of these two types of democracy did the Founding Fathers favor? What was the Founders’ view on the subject of direct democracy and the “will of the people”?
The share cropper was a freed slave that came back to work on the same plantation after being freed because the slave had nowhere to go. Share croppers, unlike slaves, were not supported by the plantation owners. They were left to fend for themselves. In many cases, the sharecroppers were indebted to the land owners and had to pay the landowners before for their own families. In many ways, it was nothing more than a metamorphosis of slavery.
Plantations were a big part of the economy in the South because that’s where they grew their cotton, and without slaves, the plantations would die. The economy was a cause in the Civil War because the North and South started to realize who wanted slaves and who didn’t. Another important cause of the Civil War was conflict between the North and the South about the issue of slavery. Slavery was a big issue in the South, whereas the North yearned for the abolish of slave labor. According to Document 1, Railroads were slim in the South, for the reason that slaves would have an easy way to escape.
The domination of politics and agitation due to wealth by small groups of families was the approximate cause for the fall of the city-states. Many cities contained a tyrant who controlled and governed at their own will. If there was a conflict between aristocracy and the middle class then the government would choose the best solution after the city of Athens fell into democracy the surrounding cities also fell into democracy. The community consisted of peasants, merchants, craftsman and slaves; they made up the middle class. Peasant families worked the land and handed a portion of the crop to the owner.
Also, he gave elected officials the right to choose their own followers to public office. Jacksonian Democrats also sought “relaxed property qualifications to vote”. Jacksonian Democrats were all about representing the common man, and, since it represented the powerful and wealthy eastern people trumping over poor farmers, they shut down the “Second Bank of The United States”. Populists were also about representing the common man. In fact, they wanted “free and unlimited coinage of silver” to help debtor farmers in the west that had borrowed gold from wealthy western Americans.
Men were social ranked upon more about how hard they worked rather than financial background, but even though this happened the African slaves and Native Americans were still looked down upon as property of other men and savages, respectively. The Revolutionary war also had a major effect on the political polices in the United States. Before the war women had nearly no rights except to raise a family. After the War women
The Age of Democracy and the Age of Absolutism were two different periods of time. The age of Enlightenment had new ideas spreading throughout the world about government and human rights. The enlightenment was a great period of establishment of democracy .A democracy is when the common people are considered as the primary source of political power. Throughout the enlightenment there were philosophers who believed greatly in a democratic government. Some of the most familiar philosophers were Voltaire, John Locke, and Montesquieu.
Both Athens and Sparta have a government system that rules over the people and has restrictions for the citizens. However, Athens is a democratic place while Sparta is a monarchy mixed with an oligarchy. The democratic city-state was ruled
They depended on slave labor for economic stability. Without the slaves many whites believed they were not able or should be doing the backbreaking labor. The plantation owners also needed the support of the slaves in all areas of their lives such as: cooks, housecleaners, nannies and chauffeurs. The possibility of life without the slaves was devastating. Slaves were the support system of their owners.
More often than not it was a battle of wills between the slave and their master – and due to politics being dramatically unfavourable against the blacks, the masters would often abuse this political freedom in their punishment. However, this would cause a lot of expense and trouble to masters so it was soon established that slaves could cause severe inconvenience and disruption to their business if masters continued like this. Once reasonable authority was exerted by the slaves, many masters saw it easier to let them work within (comparatively) bigger perimeters. Masters tended not to push this convention as slaves had nothing to lose whereas masters had money and pride at stake if some, unspoken, boundaries weren't set. By using the same racist nicknames which whites called blacks, such as “niggers”, with each other, it ridiculed the whole scenario.