Spanking helps to teach our kids right from wrong and what path they should follow, if the spanking is a negative treatment that stops them from doing things like, fighting, stealing, lying and any other negative behaviour that will make them not want to do it anymore. It will teach them that the consequences of that behaviour are good and they won’t do it anymore, so child spanking is not abusive it is teaching and instructing. Spanking long term consequences can cause increased aggressiveness in children which is what you would see in an abusive
The love and warmth from a parent will show and let the child know that the parent cares about their will being and that they do notice the way that they act. They show that the punishment that they give the child hurts the parent more that the child, this is why spanking does not help the child’s behavior. Reaction According to this article toddlers can be taught at an early age that behavior is something that we have to show in a positive way. The younger we teach our children the less spanking we have to do. We have to show our limits and guide our children in positive behavior so that we can avoid spanking or any other form of corporate punishment.
The misbehavior can be prevented if you will ask the child what’s wrong with him and explain that the inappropriate behavior isn’t acceptable to express how he feels. Support the child’s feelings when he’s showing an inappropriate behavior not by accepting it and doing nothing about it but by not disregarding the misbehavior and its cause. Situation 2: Children behave inappropriately when they want something like a toy. The child throws tantrums and cries. The staff just gave the toy so the child will stop.
Eventually after a few spankings here and there the child will learn from right and wrong very quickly. Depending on the degree of the spanking the child is receiving, parents should have the option of spanking their children. As ridiculous as it may sound, adults are not able to reason with many children now and days and some times and the only way for the child to actually listen to their parents is by the physical force that is needed or could be used in the situation so with that being said, yes parents should be able to spank their kids. Hebrews 11:12 for the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it. Discipline is an activity that takes place in the moment but always for the sake of later.
The majority of Americans will say that spanking is abusive, that it teaches children to be aggressive, and that there is no instructional value. These are all myths. Abusive parents do not use spankings for correctional purposes; they lash out and take their anger out on their children. Second, abusive parents don’t just spank they hit or beat their children. But for non abusive parents, spanking is done out of love and care to correct a child’s behavior.
Physical punishment is of course also not an option as it can scar the child emotionally and mentally. Though some differ for most children, principles like respecting the child's customs, values and spiritual beliefs as well their family comes into play when working with children from minority groups. These policies mean that all ethnicities and races and religions must be respected as not doing so could lead not only to hurting the child mentally and emotionally, but can lead to court cases as well. "Even if it was proved that physically punishing children was effective, would that make it any less a violation of their rights? No amount of research would alter the fact that such behaviour is wrong and a breach of human rights."
Corporal Punishment PSY 101 Introduction to Psychology Is corporal punishment needed to discipline children? Some would argue that corporal punishment is needed to discipline child where others will argue that it is not needed. Forty years ago it was acceptable to punish your child as you saw fit. The problem became that some would take this punishment to a whole other level and hurt the child. Punishing your child for their bad behavior should never cause them physical or mental damage.
JONATHAN GRUPENACHER ESLL 26 HOLLY CROWER ESSAY 2 DRAFT 1 CHILDREN NEED TO PLAY, NOT COMPETE Competing between the ages of six and twelve can affect the physical and psychological development of a child and provide wrong thoughts to people. As Jessica Statsky mentions in “Children Need to Play, Not Compete,” the expectation of always winning and the fear of being hurt can depress and discourage children. Also, competing can be considered counterproductive, since players are eliminated before being ready to enter into contest. Additionally, even though the risk of injury is very small, children are not yet physically prepared to crash into others. Finally, competing involves a lot of pressure, which unconsciously makes kids focus only on winning.
Turley argued that violent toys offer advantages because they aid children in channelling their aggression and seen as a valuable vehicle to process violence. However he failed to address how this could help convince zero-tolerance parents who viewed violent toys as an encouragement of aggressive behaviours and violent attitude. Despite putting in reasonable effort in his claim of having a healthy dose of violence, the result would as undesirable if violence had been misinterpreted or mishandled such as in the case of the 1999 Columbine High School shootings. Turley should therefore be educating parents on guiding their children when playing with such violent toys and not exposing to children directly. While Turley provides sufficient amount of evidence from various professionals, the essence of the author’s original argument that violent toys should be seen as beneficial was lost in the midst of quoting the many opinions and research of other individuals.