Indestructible Love Shakespeare's sonnet CXVI represents one of the most powerful poems defending true love. While being such a simple poem, the lines in sonnet CXVI effectively grasp the focus of endless love. Morality is not a worry in love, it is non existent. True love remains solid through any disruptive path of time and even though our physical beauty fades, our love carries on and becomes immortal. Shakespeare opens this poem with his opinion of how true love should be.
We will have to assume that what Shakespeare means is that love between people can change, but love as an idea will never wither or die. This sonnet attempts to define love, by telling both what it is and is not. In the first quatrain, the speaker says that love—”the marriage of true minds”—is perfect and unchanging; it does not “admit impediments,” and it does not change when it find changes in the loved one. In the second quatrain, the speaker tells what love is through a metaphor: a guiding star to lost ships (“wandering barks”) that is not susceptible to storms (it “looks on tempests and is never shaken”). In the third quatrain, the speaker again describes what love is not: it is not susceptible to time.
Both poems generally give a positive overview of love; both poets suggest that love is never ending and can battle through bad situations. Shakespeare’s sonnet takes the form of argument, talking about the unchanging and eternal qualities of love whilst Browning’s sonnet is like a direct poem to her husband discussing the nature of her love for him. Shakespeare starts the poem by saying “let me not to the marriage of true minds” which sets the tone and exploration of true love. Browning starts by saying “how do I love thee? Let me count the ways!” She is suggesting that we can say that we love someone in many different ways.
Love is an important part of life. William Shakespeare’s interpretation of love in his poem, “Let me not to the marriage of true minds”, defines love as constant, and timeless. The love Shakespeare speaks of does not change even when the circumstances surrounding it changes, “Love is not love/Which alters when it alteration finds/Or bends with the remover to remove” (lines 2-4). Those lines speak of a love that is steadfast and does not weaken when challenged. It grows and is the one constant in any relationship.
Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.” (Bible, 1 Corinthians 13:4-7, NIV) In reality, love is none of those things. As a matter of fact, the true description of love is much darker, much less romantic or poetic than the common perception. Truth is, love is an inescapable trap. In Maria Candelaria and Doña Flor and her two husbands you have two couples, (Maria Candelaria and Lorenzo Rafael) and (Doña Flor and Vadinho), who have every reason not to be with one another, persisting to be together despite all opposition.
Manhunt and Sonnet 116 Both poems; ‘The Manhunt’ and ‘sonnet 116’ discuss the theme of unconditional love, conveying that if the love is strong enough, nothing should ever alter it. However, both are very different in the ways love is challenged; in the poem ‘The Manhunt’, the fact that a husband has come back from war a different man than what he went is what makes the wife reflect on her feelings towards her broken husband. Whereas ‘Sonnet 116’ talks more about love not being affected by anything, whether that be time, old age or death. During ‘Sonnet 116’, in line 9 Shakespeare personifies love, ‘Love’s not Time’s fool’ suggesting that time should not affect true love, and it doesn’t matter whether you spend ‘hours or weeks’ with somebody, love will always prevail. However, in ‘The Manhunt’, the poet uses metaphors to refer to some of the husband’s body parts.
Similarly, in Sonnet 116, ‘Love is not Time’s fool’ shows that love lasts a long time, the personification of ‘Love’ and ‘Time’ emphasis that love is greater than and cannot be affected by time. Throughout the poem Valentine, Duffy uses an onion as an extended metaphor for true love. "I give you an onion" Duffy cleverly uses the onion in various different ways to explain her views about love. In Sonnet 116 the metaphor ‘that looks on tempests and is never shaken’ shows that Shakespeare believes that true love cannot be destroyed by an argument or when going through hard times. Valentine has a negative view throughout it, ‘It will blind you with
How Shakespeare love is unique towards his beloved in ‘Sonnet 130’? Ans; Shakespeare is one of the greatest English sonneteer and also a modern poet. In his sonnet 130 he describes his beloved beauty in an anti Petrarchan way. He dose not exaggerate his beloved beauty like other poet in that time. He describes that his beloved is nothing unusual in the world and she is as simple as a women on the ground.
Shakespeare knew his audiences wanted plays about revenge so he wrote them. “During the time of Elizabethan theater, plays about tragedy and revenge were very common and a regular convention seemed to be formed on what aspects should be put into a typical revenge tragedy.” (Literary Articles). He certainly did write his stories for his audiences and it paid off. Especially with, Hamlet. Hamlet is one those plays that was spawned on revenge and thrived on it as
The basic division of this poem’s argument into the various parts of the sonnet form is extremely simple: the first quatrain says what love is not (changeable), the second quatrain says what it is (a fixed guiding star unshaken by tempests), the third quatrain says more specifically what it is not (“time’s fool”—that is, subject to change in the passage of time), and the couplet announces the speaker’s certainty. What gives this poem its rhetorical and emotional power is not its complexity; rather, it is the force of its linguistic and emotional conviction. The language of Sonnet 116 is not remarkable for its imagery or metaphoric range. In fact, its imagery, particularly in the third quatrain (time wielding a sickle that ravages beauty’s rosy lips and cheeks), is rather standard within the sonnets, and its major metaphor (love as a guiding star) is hardly startling in its originality. But the language is extraordinary in that it frames its discussion of the passion of love within a very restrained, very intensely disciplined rhetorical structure.