Shakespeare opens this poem with his opinion of how true love should be. There is no reason to why the “marriage of true minds” that truly love each other should not be bound together (1). The sense that love isn't really love if it changes by itself, allows itself to be changed, or is changed if the beloved changed or disappears is presented in the first quatrain. Shakespeare uses alliteration in lines 2-4 to express his idea that “love is not love/Which alters when it alteration finds,/Or bends with the remover to remove”. Alliteration helps the lines to flow effortlessly while emphasizing his point of each phrase.
Compare how ideas about love are presented in Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116 and Barrett-Browning’s Sonnet 43. In the course of the essay, I will compare and contrast both poems’ idea of love. Both poems generally give a positive overview of love; both poets suggest that love is never ending and can battle through bad situations. Shakespeare’s sonnet takes the form of argument, talking about the unchanging and eternal qualities of love whilst Browning’s sonnet is like a direct poem to her husband discussing the nature of her love for him. Shakespeare starts the poem with the imperative “let me not to the marriage of true minds” which sets the tone and exploration of true love.
The definite rhythm and iambic pentameter of sonnet 116 gives it a flowing nature that can't be stopped much like the emotion of true love. Although the feeling of love is intense in this poem, one gets the sense that the emotion is completely logical as Shakespeare puts across his ideas coherently and there is little room for ambiguity. the use is simple imagery such as "an ever fixed mark" shows the clarity of love. In the times of Shakespeare, the references to maritime and biblical concepts would have been understood by all who read this poem. By making his imagery so relatable and closed to interpretation, Shakespeare is able to capture the very essence of the definite nature of love, i.e.
Compare how language is used to express an opinion of love in sonnet 116 and another poem (Quickdraw) Shakespeare’s ‘Sonnet 116’ and Carol Ann Duffy’s poem ‘Quickdraw’ both talk about the relationship between two people, however they talk about them in very contrasting ways. Sonnet 116 and Quickdraw are written in different forms. Shakespeare’s poem is written in sonnet form with three quatrains and a rhyming couplet. This regular pattern shows that this is what love should be like and is normal. The use of iambic pentameter also stresses key ideas and words whilst the poem can still flow.
He uses many examples from Shakespeare regarding how multiple relationships failed due to faults and errors on of the lovers, stating their doom from the beginning, as they were more just lust than pure love. Another feature of a loving relationship that the writer subtly alluded to in his discussion is the necessity of good communication. Good communication, he attests, keeps a couple attentive to one another, and thus more relevantly in love. Honesty and communication is key to a successful marriage. Davies concludes with what he believes is the most critical element in a loving relationship, openness.
Romeo and Juliet Essay Every person views love in a different way. At times, the way a person expresses their love depends on who they have the emotions for. In Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Mercutio views love as a joke while Friar Laurence's idea of love is more passionate. Love is shown as a vulgar item when seen through Mercutio's view. “Prick love for pricking, and you beat love down.” (Act I Scene IV) Mercutio believes that love is only about being sexual to one's partner.
Lastly, Juliet’s view of love is logical; she does not follow love blindly. Mercutio’s view of love is humorous and cynical. He believes that love is a burden and love is not worth the burden. Mercutio talks to Romeo and says, “To sink in it, should you burthen love—Too great
They both sought out to improve the outlooks upon all three by justifying that all can end disastrously. And just as in traditional love stories, both works out in the end so that the constructive blow to one’s self was softer. But, on the other hand, the ways in which they were carried out linguistically were quite dissimilar. To embark on the views and opinions of marriage, both writers reflect a sense of parallelism with it in their texts. With the case of Much Ado, Shakespeare states that a “Man is a giddy thing...” (V.IV.75), stating that men are impulsive and frivolous as to relationships.
It is also reflective of his style of love, as he sees it as a stubborn enduring thing ; Love is not love/ Which alters when it alteration finds.’ Here Shakespeare wants to portray that love transcends human behaviour and is one of the purest aspects of human character. The poets write very
Love is an important part of life. William Shakespeare’s interpretation of love in his poem, “Let me not to the marriage of true minds”, defines love as constant, and timeless. The love Shakespeare speaks of does not change even when the circumstances surrounding it changes, “Love is not love/Which alters when it alteration finds/Or bends with the remover to remove” (lines 2-4). Those lines speak of a love that is steadfast and does not weaken when challenged. It grows and is the one constant in any relationship.