Some students think the community service should be for students who want to help and do some good for the community. It should not be a part of the curriculum of colleges. In fact, the mandated community involvement is that such policies engage the students who would not have volunteered on their own mindset or someone who don't even do any school sports or clubs. This appears to be the case in Ontario, where a 2007 study of students found that, on average, they keep the positive attitudes toward the compulsory community service requirement, and that the program had been successful in helping students who otherwise would not have volunteered. Secondly, some students argue that they are so busy for learning; sports and music training that they don’t have time to involve the community service.
Being a volunteer simply implies altruism that the individual would seek no self benefit for the service they were doing. The lack of internal motivation may lead to poor performance in the service activity. Thus, students should not be forced to do community service. Main idea 1 Supporting details Paragraph 3 Main idea 2 Supporting details Secondly, community service should be made optional. This is because, if community service is made compulsory to students, then even if they have a small wish of doing social work, will lose interest in doing so.
Students would have a less chance of getting hurt or committing murderous acts. Second, uniforms eliminate competition. Students need to learn that school is not a fashion show. I know it's fun to go shopping for the latest trends but school is a learning environment. We should be there to learn, not check out who is wearing what.
That’s not true because wearing school uniforms make students focus more on studying and less on fashion. This is because the students are required to wear the same type of clothing so they do not bother to buy expensive clothes and won’t go shopping every day. Instead of that, students will more times to do their homework or researches. Furthermore, school uniforms not only prevent the pressure that creates by the students wear the most popular brands ridicule the others for wearing cheap clothing, but also encourage students to form friendships based on personality, not clothes. “The uniform makes for brotherhood, since when universally adopted it covers up all difference of class and country” (Sir Robert Baden Powell, 2009).
When students work with community leaders in public service, they begin to make connections that could assist them in the future, but if the student is unwilling to serve voluntarily then the connection is based on false premise. Though service is important to building character, students are propelled to create avenues for finding volunteer work that do not require much work at all. While school should highly encourage volunteerism and community services, the enforcement of volunteerism on teenagers distorts the purpose of community service, contributed to additional stress, and may take from prior commitments and requirements. The purpose of community service is to assist and give back to one’s community, but the requirement for students to perform a number of service hours is counterintuitive. Volunteers freely offer to participate in services, requiring students to volunteer negates the purpose of volunteering.
The Clark County School districts policies were not intending to squelch free speech but instead were aimed at ‘creating an educational environment free from the distractions, dangers, and disagreements that result when student clothing choices are left unrestricted,’ said Judge Michael Hawkins.” (Egelko) If there is not a distraction of what people are wearing, there is more of a chance that students would focus more on learning. School is not holding a fashion show! Students are the leaders of tomorrow and the outrageous outfits worn by students need not to distract them. According to an opposing viewpoints resource center it says, “Uniforms instill discipline, helps students focus on their studies and eliminate
Yes, I do understand that the policy was written with good intentions; to keep students dressed in a manner that will represent the school well and also keep students focused on their learning not on how short the girl’s shorts are in the seat in front of them, but certain rules have gone to an unnecessary extent. For one, there’s no way possible to catch every single student that is out of dress code. Therefore, the policy isn’t always being enforced. There are students that may go a whole school day without being caught, but did this student do any harm to his or herself, or any other students? Besides the fact that it has probably highly upset a few girls that did get dress coded this morning for their black leggings that look almost like stretchy jeans because their cardigan was just a few inches too short, or because the shirt they were wearing under the cardigan wasn’t in dress code.
It would be a good “catch up” day for everyone. But I don’t believe that school is like a prison. Yes, you may get the one teacher or maybe teachers, you dislike but that shouldn’t end up ruining the rest of your school experience. School is there to educate you and to give you little tips or advice along the way, and that’s going to help you
Teachers do not get mad about cell phones in class because they are mean, or don’t want students to socialize, but they do it for students benefit. They are trying to prepare students for the future and the lives we will go on to live after high school. If we don’t learn what we are supposed to during our high school years we will not be prepared for the advanced knowledge college or university offers us. After high school no one is going to tell us we aren’t allowed to use phones in class, but it is out loss if we don’t learn what we are supposed to. Teachers are only trying to prepare us for the real world.
A strength of questionnaires for studying parental attitudes is that they don’t have many ethical issues. This is because if the parent doesn’t want to fill out the questionnaire they don’t have to so informed consent would not be a problem. Also, even though the researcher could ask sensitive questions like the respondents own experiences of school, they do not have to answer. Yet, because questionnaires can be confidential and anonymous, parents may be more inclined to answer questions as it would not belittle them in any way or create judgement as the researcher is completely detached from the parent. However, the researcher would need to make it very clear to the parents that they do not have to answer questions and guarantee their anonymity.