They waste the money provided by tax payers like me, using up all the funds for an act they could have prevented. It is a shame that someone that young can get much more assistance than
This is the type of abuse that is spattered all over media outlets. These types of instances infuriate taxpayers since this is where they see their hard earned money going to, funding not the less fortunate, but financing the unemployed leeches of American society. Various states have decided to pass laws that require welfare recipients to be administered drug tests before receiving benefits. This has, however, created a backlash from some of those receiving these benefits because they feel that the drug test infringes on their constitutional rights. This is another reason for the American taxpayer to look down on upon welfare recipients.
My mother now lives and depends on me not because she desires to but she has no other choice; this is not fair. The audience for this essay would be the government officials, people who are unemployed, the unemployed office and social services departments. The preliminary thesis statement for this essay would be: If there isn’t a change in regulations for unemployment benefits how will the unemployed survive? References * Brockman, Jen. “Budget Office warns, extend unemployment benefits or kill the recovery.” msnbc.com, 22 Nov. 13.
The welfare system in the United States needs to change. Perhaps the reason that so many people get and stay on welfare is that it is the best thing economically for them and their family, but welfare is being abused because the rules are so lax. While it does help some people who cannot work for true medical reasons, others who are not in need take advantage it. The welfare system has made people dishonest and lazy, robbed people of motivation, and encouraged carelessness in a lot of individuals. In the United States, welfare recipients can receive welfare their whole lives by cheating the system, whereas individuals who have worked their whole life and get laid off receive unemployment for only one year.
“High-maintenance rookies” and “workplace nomads” are two phrases used to describe the millennials, perceiving them in a negative light as thinking they’re too inexperienced and wonder from job to job. “Trophy kids” is another interchangeable name the author uses to portray millennials as being seen as just prizes of their parents and others. The author proceeds to explain the generation was “treated so delicately” where as teachers stopped grading in “harsh-looking red ink”. Those two phrases indicate that the generation has been babied and all their needs have been getting tailored to. Lastly, one phrase that stuck out to me in which the author used to look at millennials in a good way was, “smart managers will listen to their young employees’ opinions”.
In terms of consumerism, the good life is damaging to the environment, places too much emphasis on money, and it dwindles the importance of non-market values. According to Annie Leonard’s “The Story of Stuff”, our current materials economy is a commodity chain in which goods go from extraction, to production, to distribution, to consumption, and finally to disposal. The system sounds stable but it is actually in crisis. Anyone with a simple understanding of mathematics can tell you that you cannot run a linear system on a finite planet in the real world. In order for us, the consumers, to get all of our fancy products and up-to-date technologies, a process that we turn a blind eye to takes place.
Due to there being an overflow of members from the baby boomer generation employed in the public sector, especially for those who hold managerial positions, pending their retirement. It is situations, like this that makes it hard locating an adequate number of skilled senior managers and policy advisors to meet the demands of the general public. In fact, both governments and enterprises are obligated to provide employment opportunities to the young (Strategies for high-quality staffing in the public sector n.d.). The third emerging trend is social; we are living in some trying times. As a result of, the recent recession the group hardest hit were youth, the elderly, indigenous people, the disabled, and women (Social trends and emerging challenges and their impact on public health n.d.).
Even if taking steroids does get an MVP award or a huge paycheck, it is undoubtedly not worth the scrutiny that will be received or the side effects involved. For example, Sammy Sosa and Mark McGuire’s names will forever be somewhat damaged because of steroids. Even in Mark McGuire and Barry Bond’s record breaking seasons, there are talks of having an asterisk put next to their names because he used steroids during that time. How is anyone supposed to know if that was from the hard work they put in or if it was just the steroids. This makes for a sad situation in sports because now if one player is doing exceptionally well the question of steroids always arises no matter
However even poverty experts say that the proposal is wrong because even well qualified individuals can’t find jobs in this economy. This means that parents with no education, or work experience are expected to find a job within two years or else they will lose government help. There have also been propositions that have already passed in many states to have mandatory drug tests to people who are on welfare. By making mandatory drug tests they are insuring that the money that people on welfare attain is not being used for drugs. Advocates for the poor however, say that if you only test people on welfare, then you are single them out.
However what had formerly been viewed as a charity program aimed at helping helpless mothers, and females, was now being seen as a waste of time and money. America’s increasing economic problem caused great resentment toward welfare programs and to their recipients. White middle class America did not like the ideas of their tax money going to support other, especially when many of the white middle class had full time jobs. Nationalized reports of welfare fraud were all it took to convince the middle class that all welfare recipients were lying and cheating the system. Americans who felt overtaxed had something to blame it on now the more they resented welfare the worse the stereotype became, soon they were all drug users, who never intended to work just live off welfare, and the only reason that their children were starving is that they were spending the money on other things.