Social Learning Theory & Crime

426 Words2 Pages
The theory stated that an individual's behavior was shaped and that reinforcement (negative and positive) and punishment determined the likelihood that the behavior, once exhibited, would continue (Burgess Akers, 1966). Negative reinforcement could entail such negative events as being ostracized by one’s friends or the group. An example of a positive reinforcement would be acceptance by the group or elevation in status. Punishment could include being caught by authorities and incarcerated or fined. Akers (1977) modified the differential association-reinforcement theory and called the new theory “social learning,” emphasizing the synergy between sociology and psychology. The key concepts of the new theory were differential association and definitions (from Suther1and’s 1947 theory), and differential reinforcement and imitation (from behavioral science’s learning theory) (Akers, 1977; Akers, 1998). Social learning theory’s basic assumption is that the same learning process produces both deviant and conforming behavior (Akers, 1998). The learning process operates in a context of social structure, interactions, and situations (Akers, 1998). The probability of criminal (deviant) or conforming behavior occurring is a function of the variables operating at the underlying social learning process (e.g., reinforcement)(Akers, 1977; Akers, 1998). Akers (1998) presented the theory in terms of four testable hypotheses: The individual is more likely to commit violations when: 1) He or she differentially associates with others who commit, model, and support violations of social and legal norms. 2) The violative behavior is differentially reinforced over behavior in conformity to the norm. 3) He or she is more exposed to and observes more deviant than conforming models. 4) His or her own learned definitions are favourable toward committing deviant acts (p. 51). The
Open Document