Social Learning Theory

966 Words4 Pages
Social Learning Theory compared to Social Control Theory Thomas Zane Cordell Professor Thomas Lawrence Social Learning Theory vs. Social Control Theory “The Social learning Theory says that all behavior is learned in much the same way and that such learning includes the acquisition of norms, values, and patterns of behaviors conductive to crime, meaning that crime is also learned and that people learn to commit crime from others “ (Schmalleger, 2011). Criminal behavior is a product of the social environment, not an innate characteristic of particular people (Schmalleger, 2011). A type of Social learning theory is the Differential Association. Edwin Sutherland in 1939 stated that criminality is learned through a process known as Differential Association with others who communicate criminal values and who advocate the commission of crimes. In his famous book, Principles of criminology Sutherland came up with nine principles of criminology on Differential Association (Schmalleger, 2011). “He emphasized the role of social learning as an explanation for crime because he believed that many concepts popular in the field at the time- including social pathology, genetic inheritance, biological characteristics, and personality flaws-were inadequate to explain the process by which an otherwise normal individual turns to crime” (Schmalleger, 2011). Sutherland was the first well known criminologists to emphasize that all important human behavior is learned and that crime is not substantively different from any other form of behavior (Schmalleger, 2011). An example of Differential Association would be a young boy growing up in the wrong part of town learning from the older gangbangers the lifestyle of a criminal (Schmalleger, 2011). “According to Charles R. Tittle, a prominent sociologist at Washington State University with a specialty in crime and deviance, a Social
Open Document