Why and how do US Pressure Groups attempt to influence election results? US pressure groups attempt to influence election results to get sympathisers into power and monitor how these individuals use the power. William Storey sums up the reason why Pressure groups try and get influence an election into two goals, the first is to help sympathetic people win elections. The second is to make sure those elected help use their power to advance the agenda of the group that helped them win. It is clear that pressure groups do gain influence over election results as there are concerns that pressure groups play a too significant role in elections, potentially making politicians more responsive to their agenda than to the concerns of the voters.
Its functions consist of nominating candidates to office that the people would vote for and attaching their party name to the candidate to influence voter choice, organize and run elections, and organize the legislature. A political party can unite people of different ethnic or religious groups who may come together because of a position that they have taken with the party. The parties try to accomplish their goals by appealing to what positions the voters want so that they might gain the majority of the seats within Congress and have influencing power within the government. The downfalls of the parties are that they may create a platform and then once in office not fulfill that obligation. Once the party is in control they have influence over all levels of government.
In classical conservatism, the upper class, or elitists, were in power, not the entire society. The elitists were expected to regulate the lower class, and were given the right to decide for everyone, whether or not the decisions were beneficial to all classes. This belief, exemplified in Edmund Burke’s quote, is a direct contrast to democratic liberalism. Democratic liberalism is an ideology where the government commends each and every citizen’s opinion on how a country should operate. This form of democracy ensures that each person of the country is conscious and acknowledges the government’s decisions, as well as being part of the decision-making.
This was established to ensure that our representatives could be renewed as often as needed to reflect the public’s beliefs. Proponents for term limitations feel that officials can become corrupt and abusive of their position. These groups wish to limit the overall time that an official can hold office to ensure that new blood will be able to inject new ideas and beliefs. The opposite to this thought is that by injecting new blood we will lose the experienced politicians that know how to get things done in the complex world of politics. There is a sharp learning curve that comes with holding
These ideas would come to have profound influence on the Constitution of the United States and its Declaration of Independence. At the foundation of Rousseau’s thought on government and authority is the idea of the social contract, in which government and authority are a mutual contract between the authorities and the governed; this contract implies that the governed agree to be ruled only so that their rights, property and happiness are
Both candidates were in favor of continuing the war on Iraq. Many Americans believed money and military presence should be focused within our borders. Another reason that Americans support a third party deals with the competitive nature of the political arena. Some feel that both Democrats and Republicans aim to win the race, not to solve problems. Many Americans blame third parties for the lack of voter turnout.
Each side has valid points concerning voter ID requirements but in the end, more states are passing law in favor of supporters of voter ID laws. Voting has not always been a privilege for everyone so the issues that surround the topic are very sensitive when debated on. In order to run and maintain an honest election, voter ID requirements are necessary. Spakovsky makes great important points that state regulators obviously agree with. One main point is that without voter identification laws, such as registering in your home state, Americans will try to vote in several states in hopes of increasing their candidates chance of winning the election.
There are many merits to having the Electoral College System: This requires a distribution of popular support to be elected for President, it enhances minority’s interests and encourages the two-party system. But as there are merits, there are also many disadvantages to having electors elect the president, such as electing a minority president, the electors may depress the voter turnout, or they could just choose whoever they want to without even thinking about the voters rights. Many people have a take strong liking to the Electoral College System but at the same time many people don’t. Throughout its 200 year span many people have taken huge steps to try and eliminate it completely, feeling as if it was unfair and didn’t give the people any say so, but what they don’t realize is that the Electoral College System is based on allowing the people to have a say in who’s running their country. Some of the concerns of the people as stated before are: electing a minority President, electors depressing the voter turnout, and them just choosing who they want without listening to the people.
Due to the Electoral College today, it is hard to say for some whether or not the process of voting is fair and actually matters, or if your vote as a citizen of the United States does not count and is simply a waste of time. Today I am going to share my opinion on this controversial topic. The Election Process 3 Is The Election Process Fair? According to UEN.org, an election is the process by which citizens select thousands of men and women they want to run their government- at all levels. Some people believe that the current election process we use in the United States of America is not a fair one.
The government's main and only goal in the social contract is to protect its citizens. The contract involves the notion that people assume certain duties and accept certain restrictions on their liberties in exchange for protection and society. The social contract theory runs on the idea that those in power will rule in a fair manner and work to maintain society’s individual liberties to the best of their ability (Pollock 2007). Although, the government was founded on the concept on social