Smoking In Restaurants And Bars Should Be Banned

427 Words2 Pages
In Holland, every day almost eighty people die owing to smoke, that's about one hundred twenty nine people per year. And each year there are about 200 people die of passive smoking. So this must be urgently addressed. Recently the government has conducted a lot of debates about the subject ´smoking in restaurants and bars should be banned´. I am for this statement, because smoking is very dangerous for yourself and other people. Smoking is very bad for your health, and it has a major impact on your body. 1 in 2 smokers will die sooner by smoking. The short term effects of smoking are higher blood pressure, rapid beating of the heart and dizziness. On long term you can suffer for instance chronic bronchitis, which has a major impact on daily life. By smoking the chance of getting certain diseases is increasingly, compared to people who do not smoke. Smokers are twice as likely to have a heart attack and have a bigger chance of a cerebral hemorrhage or a stroke. Another consequence of smoking is lung diseases, like lung cancer. Of all people with long cancer, ninety percent have smoked. So smoking is very bad and should therefore be banned from restaurants and bars. Another argument to substantiate the theorem is that non-smokers are harmed by the one who smoke. A series of studies came to the conclusion that passive smoking harms your health. Research showed that people who do not smoke but are exposed to secondhand smoke have an increased risk of 16 percent on lung cancer. There are also families with children who eat in the restaurants, these children may damaged by the cigarette smoke. One in three children under four years seems regularly exposed to smoke. Infants are particularly vulnerable to the effects of passive smoking, because their bodies and especially the airways are still developing. The third argument for the proposition can be

More about Smoking In Restaurants And Bars Should Be Banned

Open Document