Premier John Brumby is big in the spotlight at the moment after announcing that there will be a ban on entering a nightclub, pub or bar from 2am onwards. In reaction to this ban, some members the public see this ban as just outrageous while others believe t hat brumby is just out of ideas. In two articles, locals Lachlan Brown and Damien R express both their view on the subject. Lachlan argues that the new ban is just ridicules, and with a sarcastic and aggravated tone aims his article at those who enjoy the nightlife. Damien’s article also suggest that the 2am lockout is pointless, but leans more towards the fact the John Brumby is really just out of ideas.
The strongest argument against the ban of public smoking comes from business owners. The owners of restaurants and bars that cannot allow smoking in the establishment are losing business from their non-smoking customers. The smoking population also believes that the ban on smoking takes away his or her freedom and rights. The debates toward smoking in public places has always existed, but know the debate is stronger than ever with the recent laws passed to ban smoking in public areas. The following debate will highlight both sides and present strong information of those who support the banning of smoking in public places and
People could no longer smoke in establishments that served food and customers did not want to come in for drinks, only to step outside whenever they wanted to smoke. Bar owners lost money because of smoking bans; some were even forced out of business. This is especially unfair to business owners who did not receive options before the bans became law. The biggest argument from
Also they have a yellowish color on their fingernails from the pack of the cigarettes. Most of the time smokers don’t carry the item but you can tall they smoke a lot because of the different smell they have. Many people that smoke try to quit smoking to prevent future health problem but sometimes it’s impossible for them especially if they are addicted to smoke. Non- smokers are healthier than a smoker. They are not addicted and they don’t understand smokers because they never experienced an addiction.
Current and potential E-cig users believe the manufacturer’s claims to be the truth because the users are searching for a healthier alternative to tobacco cigarettes. The companies who sell and make these devices are telling the public that it is a way to quit smoking tobacco products, but do not blatantly claim it to be a cessation device. These companies also advertise that there are no secondhand smoke effects, just water vapor. Studies have shown these claims to be seriously questionable. E-cigarette users believe that the vapors from these devices are a healthier alternative to tobacco cigarettes.
At least have a distant designated smoking area away from others. Especially, when statistics show 2nd hand smoke is just as harmful as smoking a cigarette directly. Even some hospitals test for nicotine as part as their pre-employment screening. A lot of other employees of XYZ Check are heavenly opinionated with this topic amongst themselves or with their private circle of friends. However, I understand it’s hard to raise the question, when you have the VP of Operations, Supervisor’s, as well as the CEO and COO smoking in areas that clearly should be non- smoking zones, to name one, THE FRONT DOOR ENTRANCE, luckily it’s an outside entrance.
Effect of Warning Labels on Smoker Author Note Effect of Warning Labels on Smokers Smoking is one of the leading causes of death in nowadays (World Health Organization, 2012), but people continue to smoke. Governments attempt to discourage smoking by different ways. In many countries, the warning labels printed on the cigarette packs. In some countries illustrate just image labels, in some just text-only warning labels. Therefore a lot of experiments have shown that warning labels on cigarette packs are more effective in engaging smokers.
Smoking in public can be dangerous to anyone around. Public smoking is also very bothersome to nonsmokers. Who would want to go to a nice restaurant, purposely sit on the nonsmokers side, and still be able to smell the cigarette smoke from across the room? Not me. Think about the money you waste buying a new pack of cigarettes everyday.
The fact that I was under the age of smoking during the incident brought me fears. The fear of simply displeasing the law, which is in this case the higher authority, led me to reject the cigarette offered by my friend. Simply said, I believe that my authoritian conscience basically overrides my humanistic conscience during the
John Pagan Pagan 1 Eng 111 Dr.Ali Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? Imagine sitting in a restaurant unable to enjoy a meal due to the cloud of smoke coming from a neighbor’s table. The fact that there was not a designated area for smokers has put the smoker and the non-smoker in an uncomfortable situation. Smoking should be banned in public places because non-smokers have a right to clean air, and because second hand smoke is more dangerous than actually smoking a cigarette. However, some people believe that smoking should not be banned in public places because it is the smoker’s choice to smoke just as it is the non-smokers choice not to smoke.