Ms. Martin is an Assistant Professor of Business and Economics at the Catholic University of America. She is an educator and her perspective in this case study may be biased for humanitarian and ethical reasons. She is employed by a Christian based educational system that believes in life, being merciful, and social justice for all. She may be questioning Google’s ethical and corporate social responsibility standards in their desire to penetrate into a country that has been known to be unethical in their treatment of their people. Cultural diversity biases may also be a factor in this case study and may be weighing into Ms. Martin’s perspective of Google’s entry into China.
In other words, when Chu suggests that eating dog meat is wrong, he should also consider whether it is ethical to eat beef or port. So to me, Chu’s tries to let us repented and to support his argument is weak. The end of the interview seems interesting to me. Chu worries that “the audience may feel touched for an hour but the next day they still have to face the pressures of society.” And he demands for “more media coverage of matters that touch human feelings.” He is very general to talk about this situation, but he doesn’t give a
The ethical decision to not spend time or money to put safety measures in the play lost lives for many. Corporate Social Responsibility should maintain high ethical and legal standards in every corporation should have a set of fundamental core values based on sound ethical principles help define the true measure of a company. Legal wise Amtrak needs to provide safe service for their customers, and they need to show them they are doing everything possible to achieve this. They need to provide safe and dependable service. As well as build their name and brand back up from this disaster.
INTRODUCTION This case is about the unethical decisions and activities that are instructed by Phil Bailey, supervisor of Empress Luxury Line. The case also describes the ethical decision that is taken by Kevin and his refusal to follow an unethical decision of his supervisor Phil Bailey by denying making fraud with the insurance adjustor. This report will highlight the ethical dilemma faced by Antonio during following unethical orders of his superiors. Additionally, from the point of view of Antonio suitable and effective strategy will be also suggested that will be beneficial for the organization and for the employees without compromising their ethics. 1) Analyze the ethical dilemma faced by Antonio In the case, when Phil Bailey told to Kevin to charge high amount of money over the insurance company for the damage of wires and computer circuits, Kevin disagreed to do this unethical activity due to having high morality and standards.
We have companies such as Enron, Tyco International, WorldCom and Global Crossing as reminders of what effect unethical behavior can have on a company and the market. This research paper will discuss ethics as it relates to conduct in the work place. Ethics in the work place Managing ethics in the work place can determine success or failure for a company. Before jumping into how to manage ethical behavior, we must first define ethical behavior. Book definition states ethical behavior is morally accepted as “good” and “right.” But what is good may not truly be right in some cases (Schermerhorn, 2005) Now think for one moment, how does that fit into a business or
Han’s solution of identifying the dogs’ owners by establishing a registration process for the dog population may instead expand the problem. First of all, it may lead to animal abuse. Under the regulations, abandoning dogs will be prohibited. Once the owners break the law, they will face a series of punishment. For sure, there will be an immediate decline in the numbers of abandoned dogs.
In this case of Kelly Kanton Labaj and Third Coast Auto Group, LP VS Deeann VanHouten the defendants were liable for her injuries because they knew or should have known of the dog’s dangerous and vicious propensities. The Third Coast Auto Group, LP failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent the dog from injuring VanHouten. TCAG is liable for keeping the premises safe, not only for VanHouten but for other employees and customers. A business owner who has a dog in his premises should always keep in good faith its customers and employees well being in mind. Even is the owner knows or believes a dog is not vicious enough to harm a human being he is still subjected to liability for
MY OPINION OF LAW AND ETHICS Ethics to me is the difference between right and wrong within yourself. For example your company does not allow you to accept gifts from companies they do business with. You contemplate on taking that gift but you know it’s not right. If you are struggling with the decision, have a bad feeling about it then its' most likely an ethical issue. Law is a set of rules that everyone has to follow.
FOE answers them, dogs are not companion animals everywhere, dogs are no more mentally sophisticate than many other animals, and the taboo on eating dogs is local, limited to our culture. According to the FOE, people should consider the practical implications of adopting canines as a food animal. On the other hand, weakening the taboo on eating dogs could indeed cause great harm. For many people, the love of a dog is their introduction to affection fro animals, their gateway, in a sense, to see the animal world as something other than objects for us to use. Making dogs as a food object would make it impossible to many people to have those feelings for animals.
An example of this can be in legal profession where an attorney is ethically bound to represent his client to the best of his ability even though the attorney may not agree with the morality of his client. The attorney has to set aside his moral beliefs to make sure his client is well represented which may not always happen in some cases. Another example can be marriage counselors who counsels couples after one may have issues with infidelity. The counselor has an ethical guideline that may conflict with morals. In business there may be different ethical issues that the company may not enforce such as dating fellow employees, taking or giving gifts on the job, etc., everyday