Causey then continues to point out that anti-hunters could care less is hunting is “economically advisable,” or “whether hunters love and appreciate nature”. Hunters say that it is ethical to kill for sport while anti-hunters say no. Causey begins to distinguish between legality and morality. The pro-hunter answers the question about ethics with facts but the anti-hunter is answering rather a different question about whether or not hunting is moral. Causey begins to discuss what hunters see in hunting as a sport.
Their source of survival has turned into our past-time. Even though the purpose of hunting now days is for enjoyment, most people still eat the mean, but those who do not are being wasteful and are breaking the law. If someone is going to kill a deer, rabbit, or other game for fun, they at least need to see that the meat is used. Leaving something as useful as good meat in the woods to spoil and rot is showing horrible character. It is also against the law to kill game for just the rack, tail, ect., and just a waste of meat.
Aside from the fact that wolves are conniving beasts, the narrator in this story warns us that the worst situation is to run into a wolf that is “more than he seems” (Carter 111). This is exactly what happens to the blonde child in the story. While she is walking in the forest she meets a hunter who carries a compass. He gains her trust, and they make a bet. Up until this point of the story, we can assume that this hunter is possibly a normal man.
Antlers, which are only found on males, are used to fend off dangerous animals and other males that are trying to get their mate for the year. Every winter, the deer loses the antlers that grew during the summer months. As a deer grows older and the genetics are there, the antlers can grow to amazing lengths and sizes. Once a deer ages past maximum potential in antler size, it is possible and common that a male deer’s antler size will decrease. A deer’s eyes are very large and are located on the side of the head so they can use them to assist their other danger alarming characteristics to spot movement and
It also shows her rebellious personality (also described as fearless) as contextually the age difference between her and her husband implies that he automatically should have authority over her. Curiosity is also present in this story, not only affecting her but also the reader. It enables the reader to ask themselves question like: “Why shouldn’t she go there?”, “What’s he hiding from her?”. This temptation is argued to lead to her downfall, due to the fact that it was only after she witnessed ‘the bloody chamber’ that she realised the
Her opinion consists of both arguments. The story lets the readers know how she feels there is no problem with hunting, if the hunter has the correct understanding and thoughts about it. Instead of thinking about game just as an object to kill, Causey believes non-hunters would have a smaller problem if the animals were respected
In “Whoso List to Hunt” the speaker finds himself chasing after a female deer that he cannot seem to catch, symbolizing a female lover that he cannot woo. He has a genuine desire for the lover, but also becomes baffled at the degree of difficulty it takes to catch her, which leads to him becoming jaded to the “hunt”. As much as the speaker wants to call off the hunt, he realizes that he does in fact love the woman; however, he warns other gentlemen that the chase for the woman is a futile one, and it is later revealed that the woman belongs to another man. The other man is a very important man, which we know because the woman has engraved around her neck “Noli me tangere, for Caesar’s I am, and wild for to hold, though tame I seem.” (Wyatt 14) As one can find through historical understanding, Caesar marked his hinds this way in an effort to keep them safe from hunters. According to Greenblatt and Abrams’ The Norton Anthology of English Literature – eighth edition, the common interpretation of the poem is that Sir Thomas Wyatt is referring to his love for Ann Boleyn, and the fact that Henry VIII becomes interested in her.
However, Helena should take more blame for causing these infirmities and being a selfish mother to bring her son such a life. First of all, Kingshaw should take part of the responsibility because he lacked enough confidence to challenge Hooper. Kingshaw had chances to take away Hooper’s dominance, yet he didn’t make use of them. For example, when the thunder came in the woods, Kingshaw comforted Hooper who was afraid of the deafening sound, and took care of him, witnessing Hooper’s hidden fear. He could have mocked Hooper the same way Hooper used to call him ‘scaredy-baby’, hence taking revenge.
Finally, the motive of the two narrators also proves to be quite opposite. These many differences allow for two interpretations of works adapted from the same sonnet. While the narration of Wyatt’s sonnet portrays a sense of struggle and hardship created by the pursuing of the deer, the narration of the prose translation depicts a story of awe and adoration caused by the viewing of the deer. Upon reading Wyatt’s “Whoso list to hunt” against the modern prose translation of Petrarch’s Rima 190, one can observe a difference in flow which affects the interpretation of the two pieces. In his decision to adapt Petrarch’s piece with a classic Petrarchan sonnet, Wyatt chooses to trap himself in form.
Coyote is a wolf-like omnivore which is from Canidae family that active in the night and day. On the other hand, sambar deer is a herbivore which is from Cervidae family and just active in the night or a nocturnal. Both of them are mammals. Moreover,coyote is in not in endangered situation bacause they have a very good sense to protect their self,nevertheless,sambar deer is in endangered situation now,because of the hunter. Nowadays, many researcher have research about their live, thus we can find the similarities and differences.