I believe many of you would argue that the law enforcement didn’t need to get a search warrant in order to search DLK’s house, because DLK could easily destroy the evidence. However, you must see that it is very hard to completely obfuscate evidence inside a home, as a house cannot be “moved” unlike any automobile. According to Chief Justice William Howard Taft, “...and a search of a ship, motor boat, wagon or automobile, … where it is not practicable to secure a warrant because the vehicle can be quickly moved…”. I bet all of us understand that although DLK could have tried to “cover up” the evidence, it would be certainly very hard to hide it completely (traces would
You aren’t a reckless driver you just couldn’t stop, yet you will receive a ticket as if you were a reckless driver, and due circumstances such as these the city is being taken to court for every red light camera ticket that is being issued. Red light cameras are now costing the cities more to fight the tickets are bringing in to the cities. According to the Miami Herald, the program carried a cost to the city of 83,347 dollars for four cameras. This cost includes installation of the cameras, and labor. From the 83,347 dollar 50,158 in automatically deducted to pay (ATS) American traffic Solution who is the Arizona based company who owns and operate the traffic light cameras, after A.T.S receives their payment that leaves the city with a profit of 32,589 dollars.
The most that our society can do it say don’t bully other people, which I have personally experienced does not mean that people will not bully others. As a society though, it may give us a sort of closure so that we do not question ourselves about what caused it. It could be from bullying to a drug problem for all we know. 2. What lessons can be learned from Va Tech?
He did not look up to him when that happened. Cologero did not think the beating was entirely wrong but he did not think that going to the extent that they went to was necessary. I could tell by the look on his face after it had happened. If I were put into this situation, I would have done the same thing as Cologero. There is not much I can do, except stand there and watch.
Feeney, M. ( ). Police Body Cameras Raise Privacy Issues for Cops and the Public. Retrieved from The body worn cameras have contributed to the decline in police ‘use-of-force’ incidents and have provided supporting evidence to the investigations of police misconduct. There is, however very serious concern about the privacy of private citizens as the footage from the cameras is considered public record. Washington Police reviewed the policy as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) stated that Washington is one of the states where body camera footage is considered ‘susceptible to public release upon request.” Kevin Drum recommends that a policy be implemented on when to release the footage for captured inside public property.
These cameras are usually implemented in high traffic public areas such as train stations and shopping centres. As well as major public areas, they are also put in dark, high crime areas such as parks or ally ways. The use of CCTV cameras is meant to deter criminals from participating in criminal acts, although their effectiveness as well as moral acceptance is questioned my many commentators. Despite the questions regarding its effectiveness, a study undergone in 2012 shows that the implication of 25 CCTV cameras saw 16 of them successfully lower crime rates, 7 resulted in no change and the final 2 saw an increase in crime. David Brooks, CCTV camera expert, states "People always expect that CCTV is going to do more than it's actually designed for... We tend to look at CCTV as a detection tool, but there's no real detection going on."
Mark Ohlms Ms. Ayers Contemporary Literature February 4, 2009 Privacy or Protection Imagine a world a world where your every action and thought is monitored and reprimanded when necessary. That is the situation that is faced by the characters in 1984, by George Orwell. Citizens of the nation are being watched by cameras in both private and public places to watch for the threat of a potential crime against other people and the government. Such a controlling supervision by the government is overdone in the novel but an intriguing idea if done correctly. Society would be a safer place if security cameras were placed in public areas to oversee peoples potentially illegal behavior.
She says that “Contrasting to the amorous relation, which is based on how something looks rather than how it functions.” Most people look on things based on how they look, as if something looks better, they will hardly judge it badly, but if something looks worse, they won’t accept it at all. I also agree with Sontag, based on the fact that a photograph contains no audio reference. If there is audio, it provides a better understanding of
Gun control has two sole purposes, to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and to help save lives. Guns and crimes do not need to go hand in hand. Having a gun does not necessarily lead to a crime. Any person or group who is for gun control admits that although guns are dangerous, if restrictions are placed on getting a gun, guns do not need to lead to a crime. Having a mandatory waiting period to buy a gun is a perfect example.
Many States interfere with the private lives of their people. This essentially means that States intervene with the personal choices of individuals and invade their people’s privacy. This has been opposed by many organizations that stand for the individual rights of the people, to privacy and to free choice. Yet, the government requires the right to interfere so as to implement precautions within and create benefits for the governed nation. The Director of NSA (National Security Agency of the United States) stated that Governments around the world have employed “confidential surveillance programs”1 to access information shared through the people’s communication devices and media.