There has always been a debate about whether are not are not children should be vaccinated before entering into the school system. Vaccinations are a means to keep children safe from diseases, while they are attending schools and daycares. Some children are not being immunized due to reasons such as religious belief, medical reasons, and side effects. Children should be vaccinated before attending school and daycare; it is for their protection as well as other children. There are many controversial issue of whether or not to vaccinate children.
Getting vaccinated may have some risks but the benefits of getting vaccinated are way better than not getting vaccinated. Parents need to take the responsibility of having their children vaccinated to protect themselves, their children, and their community (Voices for Vaccination, n.d.). Research suggests that parents should have their children vaccinated because there are minimal risks, it decreases the risk of their children from getting sick and passing it on, and there are many benefits from vaccination. All in all, vaccination saves lives. There are many reasons why people choose to not have their children vaccinated such as that they don't believe that vaccinations work or they don't think it's necessary (Vaccinate Your Baby, 2011).
Mandatory Vaccinations-by cnhuff “Does Jane know that she is endangering the population to not getting little Joe his vaccinations done?” This question could famously exist in many communities after parents find out that selected parents do not follow the doctor’s orders when it comes to vaccinations. This stigma may stand as the reason that vaccinations continue as medically necessary, furthermore, pushed as mandatory. The question for many individuals remain, just how safe are these vaccinations? The lion’s share of the public view vaccinations as safety nets that could prevent diseases and should stand as mandatory for everyone with very few exemptions in the population. However, philosophical beliefs, hazardous beliefs, and religious
According to Idziak, “Aborting abnormal fetus’s benefits society as a whole. Abortion brings about a substantial saving of societal resources that would otherwise be used for special care education of children suffering from serious diseases. These resources can be used for individuals who are able to make return to society” (p. 41). Although this seems unfair, it is a reality that people face in the world. Couldn’t express how sad this makes me, but my emotions do not change the reality of the situation.
Many doctors will simply tell you to go find another doctor if you do not want to follow the schedule they already use. This should not be an issue with doctors because as long as you are getting the vaccines it really should not matter when you get them as long as they are affective. The bottom line is parents who want to do an alternate schedule are ultimately trying to do what they feel is best for their child. Is it better to just follow the masses and get your child vaccinated when you are told? Or is it better to do some research and find out what vaccines your child is getting and the effects they have on your child’s young body?
They are safe as well as effective, they are only given to children after being reviewed and approved. They can involve some comfort and pain, but this is what I would rather me and my children go through, rather than being sick with a disease that can be fatal. A person may have an allergic reaction to a vaccination, but this is a very rare side effect. Before child/children receive a vaccine their parents receive brochures that explain the side effects that are possible and explain the benefits to having that vaccine. Doctors just are sticking people with shots because they think it’s the right thing for the children.
III. Restate thesis: Vaccines will save the lives of our young by keeping them from getting preventative diseases, as well as our old, who may be more susceptible to illness because of lower immune systems. We need to take a stand as adults and learn about what was, years ago. And what could be again if we are not careful and educated. IV.
Parental refusal of vaccines is a growing a concern for the increased occurrence of preventable diseases in children. Many parents are now refusing such vaccinations because of the possible side effects and the potential of them doing more harm than good. Although many healthcare professionals reassure the public that their children are quite safe in the use of these vaccines, and that the risk is minimal, parents are still concerned that their child will be the one that contracts that potential risk. In spite of the fact that many of these side effects parents hear about are not proven to be caused by the vaccine itself, parents are still leery of giving their children vaccines. Most of these safety concerns are based upon information that these parents have discovered in the media or received from acquaintances.
Empirical data is information that is gained through a direct observation or an experiment rather than a reasoned argument or unfounded belief. Empirical data is a strength of the scientific method as people can make claims about the truth of a theory or the benefits of a treatment but the only was we know such things to be true is through empirical evidence - it acts as a very valid source of information. For example, the chemical ‘vesnarinone’ used in some drugs has been scientifically proven to reduce to likelihood of heart failure (with a 60% reduction in mortality rates in a well-designed, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial). A key aspect of scientific data is that it is objective, meaning the data had not been affected by the expectations of the researcher - a systematic collection of measurable data is at the heart of the scientific method. The main type of data collected from scientific methods is quantifiable which in its collection and analysis is less affected by researchers thoughts, feelings and judgements.
9 April 2012 The article “Selling Safe Sex in Public Schools” by Michelle Bryant is about a young teenage girl by the name of Shelby Knox who fought to get comprehensive sex education in public schools. Shelby was interviewed by the author Michelle Bryant. Knox mentioned during her interview that safe sex education should be taught rather than teaching the students about abstinence only. Even though, Shelby has pledged abstinence until marriage, she is also aware of the consequences of having unprotected sex. The young girl went on to explain how practicing safe sex will help lower the rate of STDs and prevent unwanted pregnancies.