Jennifer Should minors be tried as adults in the court system? Should teens be tried as adults? People argue that teenagers don't know what they are doing when they commit a crime and are too young to comprehend what is right and wrong. I totally disagree. I am old enough to know that committing a crime is wrong and that if I commit one, I will be punished.
Several teenagers choose to criminal acts because of peer pressure, the lifestyle which grown up in, being around gangs, guardians who lack the responsible duties, etc. Not all threats will deter juveniles from committing crimes again. If one decides a rational choice or a
It's also wrong. While young people must be held accountable for serious crimes, the juvenile justice system exists for precisely that purpose. Funneling more youth into the adult system does no good and much harm. Juveniles are not adults, and saying so doesn't make it so. Besides, we don't really mean it: When we try them in criminal court, we do not deem them adults for other purposes, such as voting and drinking.
If you take a life from one you should suffer the same punishment if your 15 or if your 43. Its the same crime its’n it? Your age shouldn't be a deciding factor of life in prison or 6 months in a hold. You should not be un -justly punished if your 14 or an adult its the same crime. juveniles act on emotions or wants, without thinking their actions through completely.
2012 Wall Street Journal) for juveniles convicted of murder in adult court. Of course we would not want to sentence a 15 year old to “life-without-parole” if the circumstances did not warrant it. The 8th Amendment, states cruel and unusual punishment is unconstitutional. Studies done by (The Washington Post, 2007) state “that children incarcerated in adult jails are more likely to be arrested again and commit graver new offenses”. Juveniles in adult correctional facilities are not offered any chance at the rehabilitation tools or schooling that is part of a rigorous curriculum in a juvenile facility.
Also the fact that teens are so rough towards one another there brains aren’t thinking on what can happen if there physical towards people violently. Adults sometimes complain that were not adults yet, reasons why we can’t drive, buy alcohol, nor vote. In Paul Thompson’s article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brian” published in The Sacramento Bee stated, “While research on brain-tissues loss can help us to understand teens better, it cannot be used to excuse their violent or homicidal behavior. But it can be used as evidence that teenagers are not yet adults, and the legal system shouldn’t treat them as such”. Jurors should think while there in court that treating teens as adults is something pretty much unfair, because why try teens as adults if there not even close to one.
The youths that are being tried in the adult courts should be offered to better themselves as for they are not fully developed at the ages under eighteen. Punishing a teen by taking away their rights for life is not helping the betterment of society. Another person in prison means more local taxes for another set of clothing, more food, and occasionally, more space to be built. A psychologist could benefit from these children who caused trouble, especially if the trouble was un intentional. Juveniles have greater possibility than adults to make a change in their lives with the right help with counseling and rehabilitation.
I think it is clear that young people are not deterred from bad behavior by just the fear of punishment. Kids know then a person's “bark is bigger than their bite.” At the same time,if a young person sees someone else get punished for problem behavior, this might deter them by proxy. The idea of general deterrence is that just one punishment is enough todeter other people if the situation is taken care of quickly enough. General deterrencerelies on the idea that, if young people believe that society both intends to punish criminalacts and that they are able to, they will be deterred from committing a crime by thesefactors and this awareness. One example of this is that more police officers can go onto the police force, so that the young person sees them everywhere and believes that they mightcatch them.
Juvenile justice module 5 writing Name: Instructor: Task: Date: This chapter has highlighted some of the reasons behind the transfer of juvenile offenders to adult courts. The magnitude of offenses committed by some of the juveniles, for instance, fails to offer them the merit endowed to juveniles whose cases are conducted in juvenile courts. The transfer of such youths is beneficial to themselves as they are in a position to learn about the seriousness of their mistakes, therefore, trying to avoid them since they become aware of the repercussions (Elrod and Ryder 216). Moreover, such an action is beneficial to the society; as these youths do not have the freedom to walk about freely in their communities. Finally, these transfers benefit the system, as it is intricate to handle some cases committed by juveniles, while in juvenile courts.
There are certain facts and examples that make us understand the main point that kids cannot be tried as adults. Many juveniles are addressed in court for different crimes, petty crimes like stealing a purse or injuring another human to first degree murder and are tried as adults by the jury. Obviously, they cannot defend themselves well. For instance, kids cannot actively defend themselves when faced with the charges. “They are emotionally or intellectually unable to contribute to their