Using the same argument same-sex couples should not receive federal benefits. By granting gay couples federal rights, then our government is attempting to normalize abnormal behavior. These relationships and benefits will damage our
And I interrupt this not only as just other gods, but also things that hinder our religion. We do need to accept other and love other’s but not to turn against God’s laws and plans for us. Also, with the Declaration of Independence says from the first amendment that the government will make no law about making a new religion. So, even the bible and the First Amendment says they should be separate.
This raises the question of true political emancipation because true political emancipation does not have religion incorporated. In other words religion ought to be abolished in order for true political emancipation to exist. The citizen requiring emancipation in the political sense would have to lead a double life and that life of a Jew is forbidden according to their way of life so therefore it is impossible for a Jew to be emancipated as a Jew. As a Christian, one would go to work in the political scene as a non-religious, and holding back morales in order to be totally emancipated. However once that person returns to his private life, they would return to their true personality.
Although the second amendment protects these people, it is wrong to use their freedom of speech to bash another race on the media. Television viewers should not watch this network and boycott anything that has to do with Fox
Modern Challenges in Immigration The United States government should not favor any kind of immigrants. America is mostly made up of immigrants from all kinds of nations. It's not fair to only allow certain people and turn away others, because that doesn’t define America. I feel that the United States government needs to take a look at all applicants and decide fairly on, who should be granted citizenship and who should not. And that should not be based on race, religion or even who appears to be the best.
The Canadian Government should have not been allowed to force men to become soldiers against their will through the law of conscription. Conscription is against human rights, the government is using it as a tool to control its citizens and it was unfair to many people. Conscription is thus a human rights violation because in a free country, one should be free to choose to not die for their country. From the articles from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, many claims that conscription violates the following articles. * Art.1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
It is derived from misunderstanding and miscommunication. Latin Americans should not have to accept assimilation into American society, nor should Americans try to force it upon them. To solve the disagreements and weed out discrimination, the two cultures must become interdependent (Beebe, Beebe, & Redmond, 2011, p. 217) and learn to not only exist harmoniously, but to depend upon each other. While many of the prejudices that once existed towards Latin Americans have been eradicated from our society, there remains the conflict of racism and of hesitation to allow citizenship to those who would come here searching for their own “American dream.” As it was stated earlier, the United States declared their own independence under the precedence that all of mankind was inclined to the same unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. For those of us who belong to the American culture, it is our responsibility to uphold this belief and make room for those who seek the same opportunities as
The State should not be allowed to restrict someone of their rights based on a certain religion. It is unconstitutional. If someone creates laws that are unconstitional, restricting citizens of their natural and civil rights, the laws should NOT be allowed! People say that a married couple should have a family, a family that includes children. “Only a man and a woman, together, can conceive a child.” This is the opposing argument.
And will fight or help anyone together. So by us rejecting immigrants we are going against our constitution. We the people means all the people in the United States no matter where we are or where we come from if they are in the United States they are a part of us.“We the people” its not stating a specific race or ethnicity it is saying “all” so why discriminate against immigrants. We are only hurting ourselves saying we are not a country of our word and we are not united because we don't accept certain races. When other countries look at us and see how we treat illegal immigrants they say and that's what people call the world super power.
Ashlyn Smith Capital Punishment Spring 08 Capital punishment should not exist in America. Punishment by death serves no purpose or benefit to society and is an unethical practice. It simply restricts the ability to grow as a nation and as human beings. Implementing capital punishment in society is denying basic human rights, as well as, expressing the idea of a double standard: If killing is wrong, then why punish by killing? What message does this send?